Soil Data Explorer - CONGAREE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CONGAREE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CONGAREE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CONGAREE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
133A	81P0197	81GA175001	Congaree	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.4290619,-82.8176498
133A	81P0200	81GA175004	Congaree	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.494339,-82.8829269
133A	S89SC017-18	S1993SC017005	Congaree	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.8085675,-80.9038071

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CONGAREE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CONGAREE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONGAREE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONGAREE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CONGAREE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONGAREE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONGAREE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CONGAREE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. AL-2010-02-25-01 | Wilcox County - March 1999

   Generalized patterns of soils, geomorphology, and landscape relationships in the Sucarnoochee-Congaree, Searcy-Freest, Demopolis-Watsonia, and Oktibbeha-Brantley general soil map units along Pine Barren Creek in the eastern part of Wilcox County (Soil Survey of Wilcox County, Alabama; 1999).

2. GA-2011-05-31-01 | Habersham County - 1963

   Location of some soil series in relation to their parent materials (Soil Survey of Habersham County, Georgia; 1963).

3. GA-2011-05-31-02 | Morgan County - 1965

   Diagram showing relationship of dominant soils in Lloyd-Davidson association (Soil Survey of Morgan County, Georgia; 1965).

4. NC-2012-02-07-16 | Gaston County - May 1989

   The relationship of soils and landscape in the Chewacla-Congaree map unit (Soil Survey of Gaston County, North Carolina; May 1989).

5. NC-2012-02-07-32 | Northampton County - August 1994

   Typical relationship of soils and landscape in the Craven-Bethera-Lenoir, Wickham-Altavista, and Wehadkee-Congaree general soil map units (Soil Survey of Northampton County, North Carolina; August 1994).

6. SC-2012-03-14-10 | Calhoun County - 1963

   Major soils in the Congaree-Chewacla-Wehadkee soil association and their relationship to the landscape (Soil Survey of Calhoun County, SC; 1963).

7. SC-2012-03-14-17 | Cherokee County - July 1962

   Schematic drawing of a small part of soil association 5 showing the relation of the main soil series in the dominant land types, Mixed alluvial land and Mixed wet alluvial land (Soil Survey of Cherokee County, SC; 1962).

8. SC-2012-03-14-24 | Marlboro County - November 1965

   Major soils in association 1 and their general location on the landscape (Soil Survey of Marlboro County, SC; 1965).

9. SC-2012-03-14-28 | Marlboro County - November 1965

   Major soils in association 5 and their general location on the landscape (Soil Survey of Marlboro County, SC; 1965).

10. SC-2012-03-14-32 | Saluda County - August 1962

    Landscape showing association of soils developed in alluvium (Soil Survey of Saluda County, SC; 1962).

11. SC-2012-03-14-35 | York County - April 1965

    Major soils in association 1 and their relation to the landscape (Soil Survey of York County, SC; 1965).

12. TN-2012-03-19-17 | Loudon County - June 1961

    Diagram showing distribution and pattern of soils in area 5 (Soil Survey of Loudon County, TN; 1961).

Map Units

Map units containing CONGAREE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Congaree loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	6500	328447	c0s2	al013	1996	1:20000
Congaree loam	Ch	899	122713	43ph	al017	1957	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Co	2985	328494	c0tl	al021	1967	1:20000
Congaree loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	22	9547	329058	c1ds	al047	1977	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Cm	7009	329247	c1lw	al051	1948	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cn	2317	329248	c1lx	al051	1948	1:20000
Congaree loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CrA	910	2514615	2qcvg	al085	2011	1:24000
Congaree loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CnB	7000	330832	c380	al099	1984	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cf	5150	330895	c3b1	al101	1958	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Ce	1648	330894	c3b0	al101	1958	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Co	655	122835	43tf	al111	1965	1:15840
Congaree-Toccoa complex, gently undulating, occasionally flooded	CtB	5390	331370	c3tc	al113	1997	1:24000
Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	2580	331647	c439	al131	1997	1:24000
Congaree silt loam	Co	3945	124140	455j	ga021	1976	1:20000
Congaree soils	Cng	1090	126236	47c4	ga097	1960	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam	Ce	705	124329	45cm	ga117	1957	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cf	350	124330	45cn	ga117	1957	1:20000
Congaree sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CpA	3925	1672361	1t474	ga121	2007	1:12000
Congaree-Cartecay complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CrA	1865	1672362	1t475	ga121	2007	1:12000
Chewacla and Congaree soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	COA	4764	2580474	2qfky	ga133	2011	1:24000
Congaree loam	Cus	810	639938	pgx5	ga135	1966	1:15840
Congaree silt loam	Con	1375	124483	45jl	ga137	1960	1:20000
Congaree soils, local alluvium	Cng	1275	124482	45jk	ga137	1960	1:20000
Congaree soils	Cos	1218	124586	45mx	ga147	1961	1:20000
Congaree sandy loam, local alluvium	Cga	523	124584	45mv	ga147	1961	1:20000
Congaree loam	Cn	670	124820	45wg	ga215	1980	1:15840
Congaree and Toccoa soils	Cot	24365	125202	468s	ga604	1972	1:20000
Congaree soils	Cng	10875	125425	46hz	ga618	1966	1:15840
Congaree soils and alluvial land	Coa	4475	125477	46kn	ga623	1965	1:15840
Chewacla and Congaree soils	CK	15360	125546	46mw	ga628	1977	1:20000
Congaree and Starr soils	Con	4295	125650	46r7	ga632	1967	1:15840
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CnA	4970	2639048	2rj2w	ga639	2012	1:24000
Chewacla and Congaree soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CKA	4085	2639047	2rj2s	ga639	2012	1:24000
Tawcaw-Chastain-Congaree association, frequently flooded	TC	22595	325978	by6f	ga641	1986	1:20000
Riverview and Congaree soils	Riv	3340	326039	by8d	ga646	1971	1:20000
Toccoa and Congaree soils, frequently flooded	TCA	6505	127383	48k4	ga649	1992	1:12000
Chewacla-Congaree association	Cg	23225	326340	byl3	ga654	1979	1:20000
Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded	Cn	7967	115475	3w50	nc017	1983	1:24000
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	1992	2431265	2mlxx	nc035	1969	1:15840
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CyA	1385	2423738	2mc33	nc057	1985	1:24000
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Cp	2406	2450761	2n86t	nc063	1971	1:15840
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CnA	172	2433516	2mp8j	nc067	1970	1:15840
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CoA	3450	2439211	2mw67	nc071	1985	1:24000
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	1233	112758	3sbc	nc077	1993	1:24000
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	2876	2433009	2mnr5	nc081	1975	1:20000
Chewacla and Congaree loams, frequently flooded	Ch	4212	113091	3sp3	nc085	1984	1:24000
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Cp	3431	2442017	2mz3r	nc105	1982	1:24000
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Co	4266	113896	3tj2	nc125	1987	1:24000
Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Co	782	110895	3qd8	nc127	1984	1:24000
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	Co	7484	114033	3tnh	nc131	1988	1:24000
Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Cp	1735	2450748	2n86d	nc135	1975	1:20000
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CuA	45	2430853	2mlhm	nc157	1983	1:24000
Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CoA	847	2440254	2mx8w	nc167	1984	1:24000
Congaree loam, occasionally flooded	Co	6279	132314	4fp6	sc017	1993	1:24000
Congaree silt loam	Cr	1029	132082	4ffq	sc021	1960	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Co	426	132081	4ffp	sc021	1960	1:20000
Chastain-Chewacla-Congaree association, frequently flooded	Ch	18485	129946	4c6t	sc041	1969	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Cw	3306	132477	4fvg	sc045	1972	1:20000
Congaree soils	Co	391	130267	4ck5	sc057	1967	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Co	2341	130501	4csq	sc063	1972	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cs	1885	131169	4dh8	sc081	1960	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Cn	557	131167	4dh6	sc081	1960	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Co	2101	130938	4d7t	sc602	1960	1:20000
Chewacla silt loam	Ch	1981	130937	4d7s	sc602	1960	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cs	1595	130939	4d7v	sc602	1960	1:20000
Congaree loam	Co	8989	130189	4cgn	sc610	1985	1:20000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Cd	912	525072	kmct	tn059	1954	1:15840
Congaree loam	Ce	774	525073	kmcv	tn059	1954	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam	97	795	525359	kmp2	tn063	2007	1:24000
Congaree loamy fine sand	98	16	525360	kmp3	tn063	2007	1:24000
Congaree loam, nearly level phase	CoA	32	525914	kn7z	tn105	1958	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	Cn	1553	1689639	1tq6h	tn179	1955	1:15840
Congaree silt loam	Cr	1362	118713	3zjg	va037	1970	1:15840
Congaree silt loam	Ck	2185	121777	42q9	va065	1950	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam	Ch	1768	121776	42q8	va065	1950	1:15840
Congaree-Chewacla complex	CO	2037	119357	4067	va109	1972	1:15840
Congaree silt loam	Cn	590	119356	4066	va109	1972	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam	Cv	1113	516961	kby5	va113	1967	1:15840
Congaree loam	Cw	1030	516962	kby6	va113	1967	1:15840
Congaree-Chewacla complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CrA	7204	119542	40d6	va117	1990	1:24000
Congaree silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	CoA	2165	119539	40d3	va117	1990	1:24000
Congaree fine sandy loam	Co	294	120246	413x	va147	1950	1:20000
Congaree silt loam	Cp	166	120247	413y	va147	1950	1:20000
Congaree loam	Cn	133	2453562	2nc45	va153	1985	1:15840
Congaree fine sandy loam	Co	755	517417	kcdw	va157	1958	1:20000
Congaree loam	Cn	1231	120509	41dd	va179	1970	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CONGAREE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).