Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CONESUS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CONESUS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CONESUS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CONESUS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CONESUS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONESUS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONESUS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CONESUS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONESUS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONESUS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CONESUS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-20 | Otsego County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Lansing-Conesus-Manheim general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

  2. NY-2010-09-28-21 | Otsego County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Farmington-Wassaic general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-20 | Genesee County - March 1969

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Lansing-Conesus association (Soil Survey of Genesee County, New York; March 1969).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-43 | Seneca County - April 1972

    Cross section of Langford-Erie and Conesus-Lansing associations in southern part of Seneca County (Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York; April 1972).

  5. NY-2012-02-16-01 | Wyoming County - April 1974

    Typical pattern of soils in association 1 (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York; April 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing CONESUS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCsB37222893882w3j3ny01119681:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCsA6742893872w3j2ny01119681:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes107B31727230532w3j3ny02320141:12000
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCoB26793016922w3jlny03720041:24000
Conesus silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCoA5163016912w3j6ny03720041:24000
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCoC3893016932w3jmny03720041:24000
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCsB1082325183082w3jlny04320181:24000
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes65B987131004002w3jlny05120191:24000
Appleton-Conesus complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes161A143131057482y9xpny05120191:24000
Conesus silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes65A127931128592w3j6ny05120191:24000
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes65C12031003312w3jmny05120191:24000
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCoB24252925462w3jlny05319751:15840
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCoC7152925472w3jmny05319751:15840
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes790B103332934932w3jlny06519931:24000
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes790C41772934942w3jmny06519931:24000
Conesus silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes790A7472934922w3j6ny06519931:24000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCoB66002935532w3j3ny06719731:20000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCoA1542935522w3j2ny06719731:20000
Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes107B19324542352w3mjny06920121:12000
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCsB84312941982w3jlny07719931:24000
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCsC66102941992w3jmny07719931:24000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 10 to 20 percent slopesCoC3532944632w3jrny09519651:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 2 to 10 percent slopesCoB1872944622w3jqny09519651:15840
Conesus silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCsB57392946012w3jlny09719761:15840
Conesus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCsC7242946022w3jmny09719761:15840
Conesus silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCsA3272946002w3j6ny09719761:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCsB65182947052w3j3ny09919661:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCsA7632947042w3j2ny09919661:15840
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCfB79602955942w3j3ny10919631:20000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCfA13212955932w3j2ny10919631:20000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesCrB119752953352w3j3ny12119691:20000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesCrA16142953342w3j2ny12119691:20000
Conesus gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCrC14182953362w3j5ny12119691:20000
Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes107B787832503712w3mjny12319481:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CONESUS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .