Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CONDON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CONDON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CONDON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
840A0901S1957OR021001CONDON3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.2361107,-120.210556
840A0893S1957OR055001CONDON4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.2724991,-120.7038879
840A0885S1957OR065010CONDON5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.189167,-120.9805527
840A0886S1957OR065011CONDON4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.1630554,-120.9024963

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CONDON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CONDON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CONDON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CONDON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OR-2012-03-12-02 | Sherman County - November 1964

    Relationship of soils to geology and physiography in soil association 5 (Soil Survey of Sherman County, OR; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing CONDON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Condon and Valby silt loams, 1 to 7 percent slopes5B440416112321lqor02119781:24000
Bakeoven-Condon complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes2D349546106421jtor02119781:24000
Condon and Valby silt loams, 7 to 12 percent slopes5C271756112421lror02119781:24000
Condon and Valby silt loams, 12 to 20 percent north slopes6D61686112521lsor02119781:24000
Condon and Valby silt loams, 20 to 35 percent north slopes6E58136112621ltor02119781:24000
Condon and Valby silt loams, 12 to 20 percent south slopes7D9626112721lvor02119781:24000
Condon and Valby silt loams, 20 to 30 percent south slopes7E4626112821lwor02119781:24000
Condon silt loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes8B8332561592222vor05519921:24000
Condon-Bakeoven complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes10C5810361549221gor05519921:24000
Condon silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes8C951461593222wor05519921:24000
Condon silt loam, 15 to 35 percent north slopes9D421961594222xor05519921:24000
Condon silt loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes82B12196141521x4or64819771:24000
Condon silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes85C10096141221x1or64819771:24000
Condon silt loam, 12 to 20 percent north slopes83D3916141421x3or64819771:24000
Condon-Bakeoven complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes81D1356141621x5or64819771:24000
Bakeoven-Condon complex, 2 to 20 percent slopesBcC942006288123ffor66619701:31680
Condon-Bakeoven complex, 2 to 20 percent slopesCoC402506288423fjor66619701:31680
Condon silt loam, 2 to 12 percent slopesCnC205006288323fhor66619701:31680
Condon silt loam, 15 to 35 percent north slopes2306286723dzor66619701:31680
Condon silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes18C1552564463252gor66719841:20000
Condon silt loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes18B1457664462252for66719841:20000
Condon-Bakeoven complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes21D1178064469252nor66719841:20000
Condon silt loam, 12 to 20 percent north slopes19D759464465252jor66719841:20000
Condon silt loam, 12 to 20 percent south slopes20D207764468252mor66719841:20000
Condon silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes18E143764464252hor66719841:20000
Bakeoven-Condon complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes3D372726298723jvor67319751:20000
Condon silt loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes17B85886294923hmor67319751:20000
Condon silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes17C50586295023hnor67319751:20000
Condon-Bakeoven complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes18D47966295223hqor67319751:20000
Condon silt loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes17D47516295123hpor67319751:20000
Condon silt loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes3524196880829lmwa02519791:24000
Bakeoven-Condon complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes208206879229l3wa02519791:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CONDON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .