Soil Data Explorer - CONDIE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CONDIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CONDIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CONDIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CONDIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CONDIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CONDIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CONDIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. UT-2012-03-22-10 | Rich County - July 1982

   Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 12 (Soil Survey of Rich County, UT; 1982).

2. UT-2012-05-10-09 | Rich County - July 1982

   Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 12 (Soil Survey of Rich County, Utah; July 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing CONDIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Condie family, 40 to 80 percent slopes, rubbly	631S	3007	500970	jt9b	co634		1:24000
Condie-Agneston famililies complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes	632M	471	500971	jt9c	co634		1:24000
Condie coarse sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes	10	2065	497323	jphp	co640	1984	1:24000
Condie coarse sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes	11	1660	497324	jphq	co640	1984	1:24000
Condie-Winz association, 5 to 60 percent slopes	121	9265	2453666	2nc7j	co664	1987	1:24000
Condie-Winz association, 5 to 60 percent slopes	CzF	244	2770154	2tl8t	nm672		1:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes	CDE	3100	503820	jx88	ut604	1980	1:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes	CDD	2030	503819	jx87	ut604	1980	1:24000
Lucky Star-Condie gravelly loams, 25 to 60 percent slopes	LEF	1500	503872	jx9y	ut604	1980	1:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	CoG	6240	506525	k02j	ut609	1974	1:24000
Maple Mountain-Deer Creek-Condie families complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, moist	143A		3243293	2zsdc	ut645		1:24000
Croydon-Midfork-Condie, moist families complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes	143		3243282	2zsd0	ut645		1:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 50 percent slopes	NS480	99	3254031	2zw6t	ut647		1:24000
Condie family, 10 to 40 percent slopes, cool	131		625210	nzl2	ut649		1:24000
Condie family, 15 to 30 percent slopes	130		625211	nzl3	ut649		1:24000
Behanin-Bickmore-Condie families complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes	108		581632	mj7b	ut649		1:24000
Bickmore-Condie families association, 15 to 60 percent slopes	112		581636	mj7g	ut649		1:24000
Condie-Beardall families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	133		581639	mj7k	ut649		1:24000
Condie-Clayburn-Behanin families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes	134		581657	mj84	ut649		1:24000
Condie family, 40 to 70 percent slopes, cool	132		625209	nzl1	ut649		1:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 50 percent slopes	114	2727	503956	jxdn	wy638	1990	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CONDIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).