Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CONDIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CONDIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CONDIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CONDIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CONDIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CONDIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CONDIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CONDIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CONDIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. UT-2012-03-22-10 | Rich County - July 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 12 (Soil Survey of Rich County, UT; 1982).

  2. UT-2012-05-10-09 | Rich County - July 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 12 (Soil Survey of Rich County, Utah; July 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing CONDIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Condie family, 40 to 80 percent slopes, rubbly631S3007500970jt9bco6341:24000
Condie-Agneston famililies complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes632M471500971jt9cco6341:24000
Condie coarse sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes102065497323jphpco64019841:24000
Condie coarse sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes111660497324jphqco64019841:24000
Condie-Winz association, 5 to 60 percent slopes121926524536662nc7jco66419871:24000
Condie-Winz association, 5 to 60 percent slopesCzF24427701542tl8tnm6721:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesCDE3100503820jx88ut60419801:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 25 percent slopesCDD2030503819jx87ut60419801:24000
Lucky Star-Condie gravelly loams, 25 to 60 percent slopesLEF1500503872jx9yut60419801:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 30 to 60 percent slopesCoG6240506525k02jut60919741:24000
Maple Mountain-Deer Creek-Condie families complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, moist143A32432932zsdcut6451:24000
Croydon-Midfork-Condie, moist families complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes14332432822zsd0ut6451:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 50 percent slopesNS4809932540312zw6tut6471:24000
Condie family, 10 to 40 percent slopes, cool131625210nzl2ut6491:24000
Condie family, 15 to 30 percent slopes130625211nzl3ut6491:24000
Behanin-Bickmore-Condie families complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes108581632mj7but6491:24000
Bickmore-Condie families association, 15 to 60 percent slopes112581636mj7gut6491:24000
Condie-Beardall families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes133581639mj7kut6491:24000
Condie-Clayburn-Behanin families complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes134581657mj84ut6491:24000
Condie family, 40 to 70 percent slopes, cool132625209nzl1ut6491:24000
Condie gravelly loam, 6 to 50 percent slopes1142727503956jxdnwy63819901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CONDIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .