Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COLYER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COLYER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COLYER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/aRO-0561958-OH141-056Colyer3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aPK-w031962-OH131-W03Colyer3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aAD-0311982-OH001-031Colyer4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COLYER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COLYER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COLYER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COLYER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COLYER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COLYER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COLYER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COLYER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-07 | Garrard and Lincoln Counties - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Trappist-Tilsit-Lenberg general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Garrard and Lincoln Counties, Kentucky; 2006).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-21 | Lewis County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Covedale-Trappist general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lewis County, Kentucky; 2004).

  3. KY-2012-01-26-05 | Adair County - April 1964

    Diagram of the Staser-Taft-Landisburg association on flood plains, terraces, and foot slopes (Soil Survey of Adair County (Soil Survey of Adair County, Kentucky; April 1964).

  4. KY-2012-01-26-06 | Adair County - April 1964

    Geological cross section of Adair County showing the relationship of the soils to the underlying rocks (Soil Survey of Adair County (Soil Survey of Adair County, Kentucky; April 1964).

  5. KY-2012-01-26-17 | Bath County - September 1963

    Typical landscape in the knobby areas of the county showing the topography, the relationship of some of the principal soils, and the parent rocks (Soil Survey of Bath County, Kentucky; September 1963).

  6. KY-2012-01-26-19 | Bath County - September 1963

    Typical landscape in a river valley and the relative position of the principal soils (Soil Survey of Bath County, Kentucky; September 1963).

  7. KY-2012-01-26-25 | Bath County - September 1963

    Cross section of Bath County showing the major soils and their relationship to the rock formations and to relief (Soil Survey of Bath County, Kentucky; September 1963).

  8. KY-2012-01-26-37 | Boyle and Mercer Counties - April 1983

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Trappist-McAfee-Colyer map unit (Soil Survey of Boyle and Mercer Counties, Kentucky; April 1983).

  9. KY-2012-01-27-28 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Faywood-Lowell-Fairmount general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  10. KY-2012-01-27-29 | Casey County - August 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Colyer-Faywood-Nolin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Casey County, Kentucky; August 1994).

  11. KY-2012-01-27-43 | Clark County - 1964

    Major soil series in soil association 10, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent rocks from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kentucky; 1964).

  12. KY-2012-01-27-45 | Clark County - 1964

    Geolgic cross section of Clark County, showing some of the principal soils and their relation to the rock formations (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kentucky; 1964).

  13. KY-2012-01-27-60 | Estill and Lee Counties - August 1974

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Colyer-Shrouts-Allegheny association (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; August 1974).

  14. KY-2012-01-30-10 | Green and Taylor Counties - July 1982

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Garmon-Shelocta-Frankstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Green and Taylor Counties, Kentucky; July 1982).

  15. KY-2012-02-01-09 | Madison County - March 1973

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Colyer-Weikert-Captina association (Soil Survey of Madison County, Kentucky; March 1973).

  16. KY-2012-02-01-34 | Montgomery County - January 1986

    The pattern of soils and relationship to topography and underlying material in the Tilsit-Morehead-Tyler general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Montgomery County, Kentucky; January 1986).

  17. KY-2012-02-01-35 | Montgomery County - January 1986

    The pattern of soils and relationship to topography and underlying material in the Lenberg-Trappist-Colyer general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Montgomery County, Kentucky; January 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing COLYER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Colyer silt loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCoF9050548883lf4xky04519891:20000
Colyer-Trappist complex, 12 to 20 percent slopesCpD5490548884lf4yky04519891:20000
Colyer silt loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCtE1560550126lgg0ky04919621:15840
Colyer shaly silty clay loam, 20 to 50 percent slopes, severely erodedCsE31307550124lgfyky04919621:15840
Colyer silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesCtC1060550125lgfzky04919621:15840
Colyer shaly silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely erodedCsD3602550123lgfxky04919621:15840
Colyer shaly silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedCsC3451550122lgfwky04919621:15840
Colyer-Trappist complex, 12 to 55 percent slopes, erodedCoF2878552701lk42ky06919891:20000
Colyer-Trappist silt loams, 12 to 60 percent slopes, erodedCkF21482550288lgm7ky13519981:20000
Colyer shaly silty clay loam, 12 to 50 percent slopes, severely erodedCsF3466013978561hxl4ky15119681:20000
Colyer shaly silt loam, 12 to 50 percent slopesCoF398313978551hxl3ky15119681:20000
Colyer-Trappist complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, erodedCoF4684550514lgvjky17319831:20000
Trappist-Colyer-Shelocta complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes, erodedTsE2200550548lgwmky17319831:20000
Colyer shaly silt loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCmF9380549939lg7zky17919671:15840
Colyer silt loam, 6 to 20 percent slopesChD2710549937lg7xky17919671:15840
Colyer shaly silty clay loam, 6 to 30 percent slopes, severely erodedClE31685549938lg7yky17919671:15840
Colyer silt loam, 20 to 50 percent slopesCoE311552386ljsxky19919691:12000
Colyer shaly silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopesCoE240552482ljx0ky20719791:20000
Colyer-Trappist silt loams, 12 to 30 percent slopesCoD2550551530lhx9ky60619791:20000
Trappist-Colyer complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, erodedTrD25988553003lkftky61819931:12000
Colyer-Trappist complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, eroded, very rockyCpF21192552930lkcgky61819931:12000
Colyer silt loam, silty subsoil variant, 12 to 20 percent slopesClD680552259ljntky62819731:20000
Shelocta-Muse-Colyer association, steepSoE335901701225q0toh00119871:15840
Colyer-Trappist complex, 35 to 50 percent slopesCoG240414203971jp18oh07119731:15840
Colyer-Trappist complex, 18 to 35 percent slopesCoF145714203961jp17oh07119731:15840
Colyer-Trappist complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedCoD211314203951jp16oh07119731:15840
Shelocta-Muse-Colyer association, steepSfE2314206801jpbdoh07119731:15840
Shelocta-Muse-Colyer association, steepSmE93914608241l13coh14519841:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COLYER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .