Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the COBBSFORK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of COBBSFORK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to COBBSFORK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
111DFR81041981IN047004Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3899333,-84.9382083
114A13N0556S2012OH165001cobbsfork7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2714444,-84.0734167
114BBA70061970IN005006Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1298,-85.9521417
114BJE70051970IN079005Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9904861,-85.6232222
114BDC76131976IN031013Cobbsfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3361028,-85.3474111
114BDC76211976IN031021Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3112639,-85.3227833
114BJF76051976IN077005Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9022167,-85.3701472
114BRI78021978IN137002Cobbsfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3090528,-85.1517806
114BDC79011979IN031001Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.2743028,-85.4347083
114BRI79071979IN137007Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1115889,-85.1778194
114BSW81061981IN155006Cobbsfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.8700917,-85.033425
114B91P010890IN143018Cobbsfork6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.8161125,-85.7130585
114B93P001092IN079004Cobbsfork7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9483795166016,-85.7921752929688
114B93P0642S1993IN079001Cobbsfork7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.0327797,-85.6011124

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the COBBSFORK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the COBBSFORK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COBBSFORK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COBBSFORK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with COBBSFORK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the COBBSFORK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the COBBSFORK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with COBBSFORK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IN-2010-09-24-24 | Scott County -

    General pattern of soils and parent material in the Avonburg-Cobbsfork map unit (Soil Survey of Scott County, Indiana).

  2. IN-2012-01-19-31 | Jefferson County - May 1985

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Cobbsfork-Avonburg map unit (Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Indiana; 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing COBBSFORK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesClfA48512022922t68lin00520021:12000
Urban land-Cobbsfork-Avonburg complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesUfdA6861975756mldin00520021:12000
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesClfA45562009402t68lin01920011:12000
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCt531416006492t68lin02919791:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCm155511623762t68lin03119801:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCm61961622692t68lin04719841:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesClfA5562435612t68lin07119851:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCo386589646372t68lin07719821:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesClfA380166331852t68lin07920101:12000
Urban land-Cobbsfork-Avonburg complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesUfdA148816132271r4plin07920101:12000
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCt12716005412t68lin11519791:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCm7146714796272t68lin13719821:15840
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesClfA26041656255kbrin14319951:12000
Cobbsfork silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesCo27755352722t68lin15519841:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the COBBSFORK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .