Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CLOQUET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CLOQUET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CLOQUET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
90A40A170868MN017006Cloquet5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6333351,-92.6333313
93AUMN3212S1979MN1373212Cloquet3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.0059166,-92.0139389

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CLOQUET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CLOQUET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLOQUET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLOQUET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CLOQUET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLOQUET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLOQUET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CLOQUET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WI-2012-03-22-01 | Bayfield County - April 1961

    General soil areas: (1) Red clays and pink sands (Ontonagon, Superior, Orienta, Bibon); (2) Rolling and hilly pink stony sandy loams (Gogebic, Cloquet); (3) Rolling and hilly pink sands (Vilas, Omega, Hiawatha); (4) Nearly level pink sands (Omega, Vilas); (5) Undulating and rolling pink stony silt loams, loams, and sandy loams (Freeon, Gogebic, Cloquet); (6) Undulating pink fine sandy loams (Pence); and (7) Wet soils (Peat) (Soil Survey of Bayfield County, WI; 1961).

Map Units

Map units containing CLOQUET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cloquet fine sandy loam, 2 to 12 percent slopes355C18164396360f9ftmn01719731:20000
Cloquet fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes35510809396359f9fsmn01719731:20000
Cloquet fine sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes355E1937396361f9fvmn01719731:20000
Cloquet-Emmert complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes977G921396385f9gmmn01719731:20000
Cloquet loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesF9B6493114844wmf7mn03120131:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 18 percent slopes, pittedF10D202311484520h02mn03120131:24000
Rollins-Cloquet complex, 8 to 18 percent slopesF25D8509311497520h0hmn07520131:24000
Cloquet loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesF9B25393114968wmf7mn07520131:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 18 percent slopes, pittedF10D1340311496920h02mn07520131:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 45 percent slopes, pittedF10E459311497020h03mn07520131:24000
Cloquet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesF5-10A2027422282t1zqmn07520131:24000
Rollins-Cloquet complex, 8 to 18 percent slopesF25D2441251514520h0hmn61320161:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 45 percent slopes, pittedF10E440251514420h03mn61320161:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 18 percent slopes, pittedF10D297251514220h02mn61320161:24000
Cloquet loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesF9B162494002wmf7mn61320161:24000
Cloquet loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesF9B18139186145820h01mn61720071:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 18 percent slopes, pittedF10D6721186145920h02mn61720071:24000
Rollins-Cloquet complex, 8 to 18 percent slopesF25D2455186147220h0hmn61720071:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, 0 to 45 percent slopes, pittedF10E2420186146020h03mn61720071:24000
Cloquet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesF9A667186145720h00mn61720071:24000
Cloquet loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesF9B3793823026wmf7mn62120061:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, pitted, 0 to 18 percent slopesF10D1131823025wmf6mn62120061:24000
Rollins-Cloquet complex, 8 to 18 percent slopesF25D855823041wmfqmn62120061:24000
Cloquet-Pequaywan complex, pitted, 0 to 45 percent slopesF10E167823072wmgqmn62120061:24000
Cloquet loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesF9A102823027wmf8mn62120061:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CLOQUET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .