Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CLERF soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CLERF, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CLERF were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
21UCD774712577-CA-47-125xCLERF3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.831974,-121.8064804
888P044088WA037005Clerf3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8172226,-120.2844467

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CLERF soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CLERF series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLERF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLERF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CLERF share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLERF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLERF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CLERF, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CLERF as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Vantage-Clerf complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes50913648769452l23wa63720081:24000
Vantage-Clerf-Rubble land complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes7515776771372l89wa63720081:24000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5115490769482l26wa63720081:24000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes5123026769492l27wa63720081:24000
Clerf very cobbly loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes4221979768612kzdwa63720081:24000
Vantage-Clerf-Wipple complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes8941631772732ldpwa63720081:24000
Clerf very cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes4271451768682kzmwa63720081:24000
Clerf-Vantage-Cheviot complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4581078768942l0gwa63720081:24000
Caliralls-Clerf complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes495346769292l1lwa63720081:24000
Caliralls-Clerf complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes498314769322l1pwa63720081:24000
Vantage-Niben-Clerf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes90567772852lf2wa63720081:24000
Clerf-Rock Creek complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very stony38162810867142x77wa67620141:12000
Clerf-Horseflat, dry complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very stony38122670867162x79wa67620141:12000
Clerf-Horseflat, dry complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes, very stony38112020867172x7bwa67620141:12000
Clerf-Rock Creek complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes, very stony38151850867152x78wa67620141:12000
Clerf, very stony-Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes38041570867202x7fwa67620141:12000
Clerf very cobbly loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes, very stony3831020862072wpwwa67620141:12000
Fortyday-Clerf, very stony-Kiona, extremely stony complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes2015450866512x56wa67620141:12000
Fortyday-Clerf, very stony-Kiona, extremely stony complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes2014300866522x57wa67620141:12000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes201329315444751nv4swa67719791:24000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes17010000708382cq3wa68119941:24000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes1697136708362cq1wa68119941:24000
Vantage-Clerf complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes1714167708392cq4wa68119941:24000
Vantage-Clerf-Rubble land complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes1721845708402cq5wa68119941:24000
Caliralls-Clerf complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes321527708802crgwa68119941:24000
Clerf very cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes461162709352ct7wa68119941:24000
Caliralls-Clerf complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes331120708812crhwa68119941:24000
Vantage-Niben-Clerf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes173940708412cq6wa68119941:24000
Clerf very cobbly loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes47646709452ctkwa68119941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CLERF soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .