Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CLEGG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CLEGG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CLEGG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CLEGG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CLEGG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLEGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLEGG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CLEGG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CLEGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CLEGG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CLEGG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CLEGG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cedarhill-Clegg-Drage complex, 5 to 55 percent slopes47729331634922dvl1id71220081:24000
Clegg-Grecan complex, 4 to 20 percent slopes59332215445755qhid71220081:24000
Clegg silt loam, 4 to 20 percent slopes58207615427555jmid71220081:24000
Hagenbarth-Clegg complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, MLRA 4796154931634992wd4zid71220081:24000
Thatcher-Clegg complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes208121715451655sdid71220081:24000
Cedarhill-Clegg complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes4697214873231lxp5id71220081:24000
Clegg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes5725731634942x02zid71220081:24000
Hondoho, very stony surface-Clegg-Dranyon complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes10352931732932w9rtid71220081:24000
Hondoho, very stony surface-Clegg-Dranyon complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes103568829170362w9rtid7131:24000
Hagenbarth-Clegg complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, MLRA 43B86419030939102x03rid7131:24000
Hagenbarth-Clegg complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, MLRA 479611029170502wd4zid7131:24000
Cedarhill-Clegg-Drage complex, 5 to 55 percent slopes47-BL7729657182dvl1id7131:24000
Clegg-Drage-Dranyon complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes70857429810732xxdrid7131:24000
Clegg silt loam, 4 to 20 percent slopes5816309389355jmid7131:24000
Clegg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes57429657192x02zid7131:24000
Hades-Clegg-Streek complex, 5 to 30% slopes2013371629896332x3mnid7161:24000
Vicking-Clegg-Horrocks complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes2010217829897332x3mwid7161:24000
Cedarhill-Clegg-Drage complex, 5 to 55 percent slopes47156822300792dvl1id7161:24000
Cedarhill-Clegg complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes170KK56922300982dvlnid7161:24000
Clegg-Drage-Dranyon complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes708554130740422xxdrid7161:24000
Hagenbarth-Clegg complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, MLRA 43B86440431634552x03rid7161:24000
Vicking-Clegg-Horrocks complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes201015332389872x3mwid77019681:24000
Burhollow-Clegg-Mower complex, 5 to 40 percent slopesZSD180514804201lphhut0131:24000
Manila-Clegg association, 2 to 20 percent slopesUVB775749221t4mfut0131:24000
CLEGG SILT LOAM, 20 TO 30 PERCENT SLOPESCFE805482684j68gut60319681:20000
Cedarhill-Clegg-Drage complex, 5 to 55 percent slopes471623962492lfhcut60419801:24000
Watkins Ridge-Clegg complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesWLC4480504309jxs1ut62219671:24000
Clegg loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesCgC949504219jxp4ut62219671:24000
Clegg loam, 3 to 6 percent slopesCgB840504218jxp3ut62219671:24000
Watkins Ridge-Clegg complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesWLD768504310jxs2ut62219671:24000
Clegg loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCgA614504217jxp2ut62219671:24000
Clegg cobbly loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesChC231504220jxp5ut62219671:24000
Clegg loam, 3 to 10 percent slopesCNC2357482236j5t0ut62719711:24000
Lizzant-Clegg complex, 3 to 40 percent slopesLLE1750482285j5vlut62719711:24000
Clegg loam, 6 to 30 percent slopesCEF4970484569j878ut64019671:20000
Clegg cobbly loam, 6 to 30 percent slopesCGF2960484570j879ut64019671:20000
Clegg very rocky loam, 6 to 30 percent slopesCLF365484571j87but64019671:20000
Harmony-Clegg families complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes561A331288630gx0ut6451:24000
Clegg family, 5 to 30 percent slopes128625213nzl5ut6491:24000
Hagenbarth-Clegg complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, MLRA 43B86424831733942x03rwy62319711:20000
Drage-Bruner, very stony surface-Clegg complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes380231608882yx30wy7231:24000
Clegg-Streek-Cokeville complex, 4 to 35 percemt slopes380331608892yx31wy7231:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CLEGG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .