Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CIPRIANO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CIPRIANO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CIPRIANO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
3081P037281AZ015007Cipriano7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.9764137,-114.438858
4080P016380AZ013004Cipriano6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.0502777,-112.5344467
4078P0304S1978AZ013005Cipriano6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.7981224,-112.2526779

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CIPRIANO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CIPRIANO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CIPRIANO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CIPRIANO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CIPRIANO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CIPRIANO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CIPRIANO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CIPRIANO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AZ-2011-05-27-01 | Aguila-Carefree Area, Parts of Maricopa and Pinal Counties - 1986

    Idealized soil-landscape profile (Soil Survey of Aguila-Carefree Area, Parts of Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona; 1986).

  2. AZ-2011-05-27-12 | Gila Bend-Ajo Area - 1997

    An idealized soil-landscape profile of the Maricopa Mountains (Soil Survey of Gila Bend-Ajo Area, Arizona; 1997).

  3. AZ-2011-05-27-13 | Gila Bend-Ajo Area - 1997

    Cross section of the Valley of the Ajo, from Black Mountain across Rio Cornez (Soil Survey of Gila Bend-Ajo Area, Arizona; 1997).

  4. AZ-2011-05-27-28 | Pinal County, Western Part - 1991

    Generalized relationship of some soils in the survey area (Soil Survey of Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part; 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing CIPRIANO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cipriano very stony loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes31209715078941mm2raz62720051:24000
Suncity-Cipriano complex, 1 to 7 percent slopes11025490529711s3raz64519821:24000
Gunsight-Cipriano complex, low precipitation, 1 to 7 percent slopes6914090531191s8jaz64519821:24000
Ebon-Gunsight-Cipriano association, 3 to 25 percent slopes4712990530801s78az64519821:24000
Sal-Cipriano complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes10612120529641s3jaz64519821:24000
Gunsight-Cipriano complex, 1 to 7 percent slopes6810380531181s8haz64519821:24000
Luke-Cipriano association, 1 to 15 percent slopes749981531281s8taz64519821:24000
Sal-Cipriano complex, low precipitation, 1 to 10 percent slopes1079730529651s3kaz64519821:24000
Beeline-Cipriano complex, 3 to 45 percent slopes99720531471s9faz64519821:24000
Cipriano very gravelly loam217120530241s5gaz64519821:24000
Cipriano gravelly loamCp1070214062331j69caz64619721:24000
Cipriano-Hyder-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes9111759534921snkaz65319851:24000
Gunsight-Cipriano complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes3566631534541smbaz65319851:24000
Cipriano-Momoli complex, 1 to 7 percent slopes1025189534271slgaz65319851:24000
Gunsight-Cipriano complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes2528437535501sqfaz65919841:24000
Cipriano cobbly loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes84694535801srdaz65919841:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CIPRIANO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .