Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CIENO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CIENO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CIENO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
150A79P0252P79TX469001Cieno8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.9775,-96.8994444
150A89P0035P88TX469004Cieno6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.874445,-96.957222

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CIENO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CIENO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CIENO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CIENO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CIENO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CIENO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CIENO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CIENO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-02-28 | Colorado County - 2006

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Telf-Nada-Garwood general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Colorado County, Texas; 2006).

  2. TX-2010-11-03-13 | Goliad County - 2010

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Telferner-Laewest-Edna general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Goliad County, Texas; 2010).

  3. TX-2012-03-21-28 | Lavaca County - December 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Inez-Morales-Cleno map unit (Soil Survey of Lavaca County, TX; 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing CIENO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Nada-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesNaA593053643012v3cqtx08919971:24000
Telf-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesTfA131383643232x3yvtx08919971:24000
Garwood-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesGrA78693642802y8wwtx08919971:24000
Morales-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesMxA30933643002v3cptx08919971:24000
Edna-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesEc167513659352vv5ptx15719561:20000
Texana-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesTncA115331033302v3chtx15719561:20000
Mocarey-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesMc4401366089d8ybtx16719851:24000
Cieno loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedCnA66424368082v3cntx17520101:24000
Texana-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesTxA559153754592v3chtx23919861:24000
Morales-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesMrA350813754492v3cptx23919861:24000
Nada-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesNcA297703754512v3cqtx23919861:24000
Morales-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesMcA449433690402v3cptx28519861:24000
Nada-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesNaA19093690412v3cqtx28519861:24000
Edna-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesExA50503704992vv5ptx32119911:24000
Cieno loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedCeA19673704942v3cntx32119911:24000
Nada-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesNcA450103731082v3cqtx46919801:24000
Nada-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesNacA2606029674532v3cqtx48119681:20000
Edna-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesEtA139093732552vv5ptx48119681:20000
Texana-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesTncA613929674572v3chtx48119681:20000
Cieno loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedTp39783732682v3cntx48119681:20000
Telf-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesTenA394129674862x3yvtx48119681:20000
Morales-Cieno frequently ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesMrcA343229674522v3cptx48119681:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CIENO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .