Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHISWELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHISWELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHISWELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHISWELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHISWELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHISWELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHISWELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHISWELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHISWELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHISWELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHISWELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CHISWELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Chiswell channery loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesCkE1198563606lxgvtn60620011:24000
Chiswell channery loam, 12 to 25 percent slopesCkD198563605lxgttn60620011:24000
Muskingum-Chiswell complex, 25 to 60 percent slopesMwE1223529699ks62tn60820011:24000
Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes11E3698519036kf33va02319901:20000
Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes11D2087519035kf32va02319901:20000
Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes11C1224519034kf31va02319901:20000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes5E8779520369kgh3va16119901:24000
Chiswell-Litz-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes6C5106520385kghmva16119901:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes5D3573520368kgh2va16119901:24000
Chiswell-Litz-Urban land complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes6D2891520386kghnva16119901:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes5C1703520367kgh1va16119901:24000
Litz-Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes33F255125148082qdbqva16320101:24000
Litz-Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes33E201925148072qdbpva16320101:24000
Litz-Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes33C65325148062qdbnva16320101:24000
Berks-Chiswell complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes1F1152816711262wplpva16720061:24000
Berks-Chiswell complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes1E312816718262wplnva16720061:24000
Berks-Chiswell complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes3F194227780092wplpva16920031:24000
Berks-Chiswell complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes3E85497780072wplnva16920031:24000
Chiswell-Litz-Groseclose complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes10E10120518602kdn3va17319951:24000
Chiswell-Litz-Groseclose complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes10D3955518601kdn2va17319951:24000
Chiswell-Litz-Groseclose complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes10C1716518600kdn1va17319951:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes16F1184521998kj5nva18519961:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes16E1007521997kj5mva18519961:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes16D340521996kj5lva18519961:24000
Chiswell-Groseclose-Litz complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4E22681518990kf1mva19719881:15840
Chiswell-Groseclose-Litz complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4D12601518989kf1lva19719881:15840
Chiswell-Groseclose-Litz complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes4C9258518988kf1kva19719881:15840
Chiswell-Litz complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes13E52725252272qm0sva6061:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes13D5525252262qm0rva6061:24000
Chiswell-Litz complex, 60 to 80 percent slopes13F3025252282qm0tva6061:24000
Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes2E1831740342z3d4va8501:24000
Chiswell-Groseclose complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes2C431740352z3d5va8501:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHISWELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .