Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHILLUM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHILLUM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHILLUM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14888P038588MD510007Chillum5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3486099,-76.6191635
149A40A120355MD031001CHILLUM3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.0496091,-76.9496866
149A85P028685NJ033001Chillum6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5210333,-75.289475
149A86P028785NJ033020Chillum6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5349998,-75.2366638
149A92P036691NJ033003Chillum6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.6061096,-75.2433319
149A92P037091NJ033005Chillum5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.6097221,-75.2450027

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHILLUM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHILLUM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILLUM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILLUM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHILLUM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILLUM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILLUM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHILLUM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. DC-2011-05-31-01 | District of Columbia - 1976

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Urban land-Beltsville-Chillum association (Soil Survey of District of Columbia; 1976).

  2. DC-2011-05-31-04 | District of Columbia - 1976

    Diagram of fall line between the Piedmont Plateau and the Coastal Plain. Diagram also shows the relationship of parent material and topography (Soil Survey of District of Columbia; 1976).

  3. MD-2012-02-03-08 | Baltimore County - March 1978

    Cross section showing relationships of parent material and topography to certain soil series of Baltimore County. Fall line shown in drawing separates soil of Piedmont Province (left) from soils of Atlantic Coastal Plain (right) (Soil Survey of Baltimore County, Maryland; March 1976).

  4. NJ-2010-09-13-07 | Salem County - 2008

    Typical relationship of the soils, landform position, and parent material for soils developing in eolian deposits underlain by sandy materials (Soil Survey of Salem County, New Jersey; 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing CHILLUM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Urban land-Chillum complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesUeB84812867549wtdc00119751:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCdC81412858049srdc00119751:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesCdB56612857949sqdc00119751:12000
Urban land-Chillum complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesUeC55712867649wvdc00119751:12000
Chillum silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesCcC18912857749sndc00119751:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesCdD12912858149ssdc00119751:12000
Chillum silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesCcD9312857849spdc00119751:12000
Chillum silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesCcB3912857649smdc00119751:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesCbB534640615phm0md00320031:12000
Chillum loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCaC2261377324m9zmd00320031:12000
Chillum loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesCaB1391375504m43md00320031:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesCbB162324041682lpqtmd00520101:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesCbD137124041702lpqwmd00520101:12000
Chillum silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCaC79824041672lpqsmd00520101:12000
Chillum silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesCaB52024041662lpqrmd00520101:12000
Chillum silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCbC160624406102mxncmd01520091:12000
Chillum silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesCbB125924406092mxnbmd01520091:12000
Chillum silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesCbD100324406112mxndmd01520091:12000
Chillum loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesCaB24624406072mxn8md01520091:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesCcB21724406192mxnnmd01520091:12000
Chillum loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCaC18824406082mxn9md01520091:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesCcD10724406202mxnpmd01520091:12000
Urban land-Chillum-Beltsville complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesUcB2463793649vmvlmd02720041:12000
Urban land-Chillum-Beltsville complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesUcD887793650vmvmmd02720041:12000
Chillum loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCeC479792806vlzdmd02720041:12000
Chillum loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesCeB457792805vlzcmd02720041:12000
Chillum-Russett loams, 2 to 5 percent slopesChB399792807vlzfmd02720041:12000
Chillum-Russett loams, 5 to 10 percent slopesChC380792808vlzgmd02720041:12000
Chillum silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes57B12153098168kx9jmd03119891:15840
Chillum silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes57C628533651kx9kmd03119891:15840
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes57UB428533653kx9mmd03119891:15840
Chillum silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes57D145533652kx9lmd03119891:15840
Chillum-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesCbB55024552482ndwkmd03320091:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesCbD22224552492ndwlmd03320091:12000
Chillum silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesCaB19224552452ndwgmd03320091:12000
Chillum silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesCaC8224552462ndwhmd03320091:12000
Chillum silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesCaD6324552472ndwjmd03320091:12000
Chillum-Urban land complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesCbE6224552502ndwmmd03320091:12000
Chillum loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes moderately erodedChB2363012829949hpmd03719751:20000
Sassafras-Chillum complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedSmC2141112835249kdmd03719751:20000
Sassafras-Chillum complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedSmC3134512835349kfmd03719751:20000
Chillum loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely erodedChC3122112830149hrmd03719751:20000
Chillum loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, moderately erodedChC2109312830049hqmd03719751:20000
Chillum loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA67412829849hnmd03719751:20000
Chillum silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedChB21949533368kx0fmd60019721:15840
Chillum-Neshaminy silt loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, moderately erodedCkC2582533369kx0gmd60019721:15840
Chillum silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesChtB53121358234kbdnj01120031:24000
Chillum silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesChtA14271358224kbcnj01120031:24000
Chillum silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesChtB106711355914k2xnj03320041:24000
Chillum silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesChtA3991355904k2wnj03320041:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHILLUM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .