Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHILICOTAL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHILICOTAL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHILICOTAL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
42S80TX043011S1980-TX043-011Chilicotal5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.3658333,-103.2252808

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHILICOTAL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHILICOTAL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILICOTAL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILICOTAL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHILICOTAL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILICOTAL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILICOTAL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHILICOTAL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2012-05-09-04 | Big Bend National Park - 2011

    Relationship of soil mapping units, geologic formations, and landscapes of the Chisos Formation, igneous intrusions, and gravelly alluvium of both mid-Pleistocene and Holocene ages (Soil Survey of Big Bend National Park, Texas; 2011).

  2. TX-2012-05-09-05 | Guadalupe Mountains National Park - 2010

    Patterns of soils and underlying material from the high country down the western escarpment into the salt basin. General Soil Map Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 appear on this diagram. The "High Country" includes General Soil Map Units 3—Victorio-Lozen-Rock outcrop; 5—Biduya-Desario-Lazarus; and 6—Lostpeak-Rock outcrop. The Salt Basin includes General Soil Map Unit 2—Monahans-Corvus-Peligro. At the upper end of the basin, General Soil Map Unit 1—Chilicotal-Bissett-Chispa-Tenneco occurs, and is on the fan remnants of the escarpment (Soil Survey of Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas; 2010).

  3. TX-2012-05-09-06 | Guadalupe Mountains National Park - 2010

    Patterns of soils and underlying material from the high country. View is from the north looking south into the park (Soil Survey of Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas; 2010).

Map Units

Map units containing CHILICOTAL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Chilicotal-Ustic Haplocambids complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes181356824402042mx78nm68820141:24000
Manzanillo-Chilicotal-Holguin association, 1 to 30 percent slopesMBE60722723440s8sstx37720121:31680
Chilicotal and Paisano soils, 1 to 8 percent slopesCLC16360723442s8svtx37720121:31680
Chilicotal very gravelly fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesCIC11950596032tgcptx37720121:31680
Chilicotal very gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 16 percent slopesCID819659604200qtx37720121:31680
Delnorte-Chilicotal association, rolling12403636585311yx3tx38919761:24000
Chilicotal very gravelly fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesCIC3772724068302tgcptx62119821:31680
Chilicotal-Paisano association, 5 to 30 percent slopesCLE1857524068312lshqtx62119821:31680
Chilicotal very gravelly fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesCIC29690588382tgcptx62219981:31680
Chilicotal very gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 16 percent slopesCID13383588391z71tx62219981:31680
Chilicotal-Chispa complex, 3 to 13 percent slopesCCD1337524938792ppwbtx62520101:24000
Culberspeth-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCVC251290190070421sv1tx62620121:24000
Chispa-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCOC42605584231ysmtx62620121:24000
Chilicotal very gravelly loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesCHC7465190072121svltx62620121:24000
Culberspeth-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCVC4443751018081135dbtx62720121:24000
Chispa-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCOC151781590041zdctx62720121:24000
Altar-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesACC1410025072522q3crtx62720121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHILICOTAL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .