Soil Data Explorer - CHILCOTT

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHILCOTT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHILCOTT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHILCOTT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
11	80P0528	78ID073001	Chilcott	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.9483337,-116.5027771
11	79P0342	79ID039001	Chilcott	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.0486107,-115.3347244
11	87P0181	85ID039100	Chilcott	8	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.1166649,-115.3416672
11	40A1105	S1957ID027018	Chilcott	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.786541,-116.6387558
11	40A1104	S1957ID045039	CHILCOTT	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.9590378,-116.6162567
25	79P0338	79ID073001	Chilcott	8	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.9444427,-116.5027771

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHILCOTT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHILCOTT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILCOTT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILCOTT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHILCOTT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHILCOTT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHILCOTT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHILCOTT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CHILCOTT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Chilcott-Catchell-Chardoton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	4105	32819	2519229	2prhq	id001	2012	1:24000
Catchell-Chilcott-Banbury complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes	4104	16953	2519228	2prhp	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes	35	13648	2496659	2q9m	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	34	12483	2496658	2q9l	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, bedrock substratum, 2 to 4 percent slopes	38	9336	2519012	2q9q	id001	2012	1:24000
Elfkin-Chilcott-Power complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	4114	8079	2519237	2prhz	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Purdam-Bowns complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	4102	6712	2519226	2prhm	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Brent silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	32	6215	2496656	2q9j	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott silt loam, bedrock substratum, 2 to 4 percent slopes	31	6156	2496655	2q9h	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, bedrock substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes	37	5307	2519011	2q9p	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Chardoton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	4109	4330	2519233	2prhv	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott silt loam, bedrock substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30	1852	2496654	2q9g	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes	36	1249	2496660	2q9n	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Aldape complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes	2363	480	2519173	217wb	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Brent complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	33	445	2496657	2q9k	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Sebree complex, bedrock substratum, 4 to 8 percent slopes	39	250	2519013	2q9r	id001	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Vickery silt loams, 4 to 12 percent slopes	33	602	81226	2qj6	id656	1992	1:24000
Elijah-Chilcott silt loams, 3 to 7 percent slopes	EcC	11222	81313	2qm0	id659	1971	1:20000
Elijah-Vickery silt loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes	EeB	2308	81314	2qm1	id659	1971	1:20000
Chilcott-Vickery complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	CrC	9634	80520	2psf	id660	1962	1:15840
Lanktree and Chilcott loams, 7 to 12 percent slopes	LmD	5915	80596	2pvw	id660	1962	1:15840
Lanktree and Chilcott loams, 12 to 30 percent slopes	LmE	3153	80597	2pvx	id660	1962	1:15840
Lanktree and Chilcott loams, 3 to 7 percent slopes	LmC	941	80595	2pvv	id660	1962	1:15840
Lanktree and Chilcott sandy loams, 12 to 30 percent slopes	LnE	624	80598	2pvy	id660	1962	1:15840
Lanktree, Chilcott, and Sebree loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes	LoB	75	80599	2pvz	id660	1962	1:15840
Elijah-Chilcott silt loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes	EsB	9500	80750	2q0v	id665	1967	1:20000
Elijah-Chilcott silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes	EsA	980	80749	2q0t	id665	1967	1:20000
Arbidge-Buncelvoir-Chilcott complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	4	45707	486186	j9xf	id675	1992	1:24000
Arbidge-Chilcott silt loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes	5	29318	486208	j9y4	id675	1992	1:24000
Chilcott-Lamonta complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	38	9352	486182	j9x9	id675	1992	1:24000
Chilcott-Igert gravelly loams, 2 to 20 percent slopes	37	5942	486181	j9x8	id675	1992	1:24000
Chilcott-Catchell-Power complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes	34	19460	81968	2r94	id681	1993	1:24000
McHandy-Catchell-Chilcott complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	118	16565	81846	2r56	id681	1993	1:24000
Chilcott-Linkletter complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes	35	9690	81969	2r95	id681	1993	1:24000
Chilcott-Elijah silt loams, 0 to 12 percent slopes	27	44108	2519548	2qzw	id685	2012	1:24000
Lanktree-Chilcott loams, 0 to 12 percent slopes	94	29543	2519622	2r28	id685	2012	1:24000
Kunaton-Chilcott silt loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes	89	20826	2519616	2r22	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Kunaton-Chardoton complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes	28	11840	2519549	2qzx	id685	2012	1:24000
Trosi-Chilcott-Tenmile gravelly loams, 2 to 20 percent slopes	160	11589	2519521	2qz0	id685	2012	1:24000
Colthorp-Chilcott silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes	32	9456	2519554	2r02	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Power complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	29	8313	2519550	2qzy	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	24	8296	2519545	2qzs	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott silty clay loam, 0 to 12 percent slopes, extremely stony	25	7592	2519546	2qzt	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Day-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	26	3686	2519547	2qzv	id685	2012	1:24000
Elfkin-Chilcott-Power complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	4114	450	2519646	2prhz	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott-Purdam-Bowns complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	4102	117	2519643	2prhm	id685	2012	1:24000
Chilcott silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	5B	276	62854	23dk	or641	1975	1:20000
Chilcott silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	5C	115	62855	23dl	or641	1975	1:20000
Linkletter-Tubmountain-Chilcott complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	2935	24380	2425725	2mf56	or645		1:24000
Chilcott-Cherry Spring complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes	7025	10191	2722260	2sf2y	or645		1:24000
Hardtrigger-Chilcott-Puls complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes	5034	10100	2946834	2wmbj	or645		1:24000
Chilcott loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes	2941	4529	2482208	2p9y7	or645		1:24000
Chilcott loam, moist, 2 to 5 percent slopes	2947	4457	2482023	2p9r8	or645		1:24000
Chilcott loam, cool, 1 to 6 percent slopes	7011	2088	2504643	2q3xx	or645		1:24000
Chilcott-Ridenbaugh complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes	5010	538	2564831	2qxxc	or645		1:24000
Farmell-Chilcott complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes	7019	533	2504646	2q3y0	or645		1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHILCOTT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).