Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHEVIOT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHEVIOT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHEVIOT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
888P043888WA037003Cheviot3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.875,-120.4783325
888P043988WA037004Cheviot5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8083344,-120.3375015

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHEVIOT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHEVIOT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHEVIOT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHEVIOT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHEVIOT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHEVIOT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHEVIOT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHEVIOT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2010-11-05-09 | Klickitat County - 2009

    Representative landscape cross section of the soils in the eastern part of the survey area (Soil Survey of Klickitat County, Washington; 2009).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-47 | Klickitat County Area - December 2009

    Representative landscape cross-section of the soils in the eastern part of the survey area (Soil Survey of Klickitat County Area, Washington; December 2009).

Map Units

Map units containing CHEVIOT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cheviot-Ralls-Rubble land complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes1017169699394rgs3wa01719981:12000
Cheviot-Ralls-Grinrod complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1005428699389rgrywa01719981:12000
Alstown-Cheviot complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes161362700462rhwkwa01719981:12000
Cheviot-Ralls-Dougville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes991347699387rgrwwa01719981:12000
Clerf-Vantage-Cheviot complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4581078768942l0gwa63720081:24000
Cheviot-Rubble land complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes4561075768922l0dwa63720081:24000
Cheviot very cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes457643768932l0fwa63720081:24000
Cheviot-Wipple-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes2299859762222k9swa63920031:24000
Cheviot-Ralls-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes2306952762242k9vwa63920031:24000
Cheviot-Ralls-Wipple complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3956684763202kdywa63920031:24000
Colockum-Cheviot complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes10102390761232k6lwa63920031:24000
Colockum-Cheviot complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes10112385761242k6mwa63920031:24000
Cheviot-Lickskillet-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes3801900763152kdswa63920031:24000
Cheviot very stony silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes227895762202k9qwa63920031:24000
Ralls-Cheviot-Lickskillet complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes381651763162kdtwa63920031:24000
Rock outcrop-Rubble land-Cheviot complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes379395763142kdrwa63920031:24000
Cheviot-Ralls-Wipple complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes394348763192kdxwa63920031:24000
Cheviot-Tronsen complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1042215761392k73wa63920031:24000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes37174870867222x7hwa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Caliralls, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes37033290866852x69wa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Rubble land-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes37072510866822x66wa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes37162130867252x7lwa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Caliralls, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes37011980866872x6cwa67620141:12000
Cheviot cobbly fine sandy loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes, extremely stony3751980862092wpywa67620141:12000
Clerf, very stony-Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes38041570867202x7fwa67620141:12000
Cheviot cobbly fine sandy loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony472630862162wq5wa67620141:12000
Cheviot cobbly fine sandy loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, extremely stony470580862182wq7wa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Caliralls, very stony complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes3700460866882x6dwa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Rubble land-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes3706420866832x67wa67620141:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHEVIOT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .