Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHEN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHEN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHEN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
2540A5201S1959NV007001Chen7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.2421227,-116.0350876
2506N0250S2005NV007009Chen7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.9359436,-115.9093323

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHEN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHEN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHEN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHEN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHEN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHEN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHEN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHEN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NV-2012-05-09-10 | Lander County, North Part - May 1992

    Typical relationship of general soil map units and landscapes: Sonoma-Rixie-Paranat (3); Orovada-Broyles-Shabliss (7); Buffaran-Allor-Chiara (11); Bioya-Chiara-Cortez (12); Robson-Akerue-Buffaran (16); Sumine-Chen-Rock outcrop (19); and Quarz-Walti-Glean (21) (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, North Part; May 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing CHEN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pernty-Chen association29064495477jml4ca72920061:24000
Thacker-Chen-Sharesnout complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes17488104860492w2swid67519921:24000
Loncan-Chen-Dehana association9506171732709252w2vnid67519921:24000
Chen-Arcia complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes2383932709392dh24id67519921:24000
Yeates Hollow-Chen-Povey complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes1637739824832rtrid70819871:24000
Chen-Vipont association, 30 to 50 percent slopes286686824982rv7id70819871:24000
Chen very cobbly loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes272335824972rv6id70819871:24000
Chen-Pie Creek-Alyan association18882519725193942qjp4nv61219681:24000
Ramires-Chen-Pie Creek associationRG17730476137hzg8nv61219681:24000
Chen-Pie Creek-Ramires associationCC9440476050hzcgnv61219681:24000
Chen-Arcia-Cleavage association1880829626339712rhgtnv61219681:24000
Chen-Pie Creek-Taylor Creek associationCD7039476051hzchnv61219681:24000
Chen-Taylor Creek association, steepCEF6306476053hzcknv61219681:24000
Chen-Ramirez423492225189122qj8tnv61219681:24000
Taylor Creek-Chen associationTA2916476168hzh8nv61219681:24000
Chen-Pie Creek association425266025189112qj8snv61219681:24000
Chen-Cotant-Arcia association1879224625179212qhm3nv61219681:24000
Ramires-Chen-Bobs associationRF2206476136hzg7nv61219681:24000
Chen-Slaven-Chen association262169125193842qj9jnv61219681:24000
Chen very rocky loam, 8 to 30 percent slopesCBE1414476064hzcxnv61219681:24000
Creva-Chen associationCV1160476061hzctnv61219681:24000
Chen-Segura-McIvey association1390206426340002rhhrnv62119711:24000
Chen-Sumine-Tusel association187218160477139j0hlnv76319861:24000
Chen-Quarz-Arcia association187415990477140j0hmnv76319861:24000
Chen-Sumine association188914845477149j0hxnv76319861:24000
Chen-Graley-Quarz association1870135104771372t6whnv76319861:24000
Lerrow-Chen-Cotant association19207070477152j0j0nv76319861:24000
Cleavage-Chen-Reluctan association16286870477082j0frnv76319861:24000
Sumine-Chen-Hapgood association5766353477256hxw4nv76319861:24000
Gumble-Chen association18544360477134j0hfnv76319861:24000
Cotant-Chen-Crooked Creek association1293930477057j0dynv76319861:24000
Chen-Blitzen-Pequop association18803890477145j0hsnv76319861:24000
Chen-Cotant-Graley association18713210477138j0hknv76319861:24000
Chen-Blitzen-Loncan association18813145477146j0htnv76319861:24000
Chen-Bregar-Ramires association18752750477141j0hnnv76319861:24000
Chen-Bregar-Loncan association18772000477143j0hqnv76319861:24000
Chen-Chen, steep-Arcia association18761920477142j0hpnv76319861:24000
Graley-Erakatak-Chen association17301535477113j0grnv76319861:24000
Chen-Pie Creek-Alyan association18881435477148j0hwnv76319861:24000
Blitzen-Chen-Tusk association174111704771172qhlrnv76319861:24000
Cleavage-Carstump-Chen association16261140477081j0fqnv76319861:24000
Sumine-Chen-Hapgood association57645643474614hxw4nv76420211:24000
Loncan-Chen-Dehana association95062756129282902w2vnnv76420211:24000
Chen-Sumine-Tusel association187214925474607hxvxnv76420211:24000
Chen-McIvey-Tweener association2191145925177022q90mnv76420211:24000
Graley-Chen-McIvey association431843124035482lp2tnv76420211:24000
Wereld-Sumine-Chen association3080820725179012qhlgnv76420211:24000
Mahogee-Chen-Sumine association94277798474641hxx0nv76420211:24000
McIvey-Chen-Keman association432642629282352w2stnv76420211:24000
Thacker-Chen-Sharesnout complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes174513929282372w2swnv76420211:24000
McIvey-Chen-Donna association1731459325114292q8zcnv76420211:24000
Chen-Sharesnout-Keman association3044456630598472w2w3nv76420211:24000
Chen-Vitale association744318029282762w2vwnv76420211:24000
Blitzen-Chen-Tusk association1741185225179102qhlrnv76420211:24000
Chen-Graley-Rock outcrop association180060725114322q8zjnv76420211:24000
Chen-Ebic-Blackleg association187543130596682w2vynv76420211:24000
Amene-Belsac-Chen association184011424035472lp2snv76420211:24000
Cleavage-Snotown-Chen association7499735475107hyd1nv76519861:24000
Chen-Vitale association74473704751022w2vwnv76519861:24000
Arva-Chen-Sumine association30705120474998hy8jnv76519861:24000
Cotant-Chen-Graley association8224235475141hyf4nv76519861:24000
Graley-Chen-Arcia association4623455475037hy9snv76519861:24000
Chen-Shalper-Shalcleav association4733135475040hy9wnv76519861:24000
Chen-Coser association4722685475039hy9vnv76519861:24000
Chen-Shalcleav-Vitale association4742600475041hy9xnv76519861:24000
Chen-Graley-Rock outcrop association47018404750382t6wrnv76519861:24000
Simon-Graley-Chen association6805622478428j1v5nv76619941:24000
McIvey-Chen-Donna association17314697478693j23qnv76619941:24000
Chen-Graley-Rock outcrop association180043954787022t6wrnv76619941:24000
Segura-Pioche-Chen association10403652478573j1zvnv76619941:24000
Graley-Chen-McIvey association4312304478338j1r8nv76619941:24000
Amene-Belsac-Chen association18401676478707j245nv76619941:24000
McIvey-Chen-Welch association4329429282722w2v1nv76619941:24000
Chen, moderately steep-Chen-Lerrow association188124376478800j275nv76719861:24000
Chen-Arcia-Cleavage association188011662478799j274nv76719861:24000
Chen-Graley-Cleavage association18849798478803j278nv76719861:24000
Chen-Ebic association18769096478796j271nv76719861:24000
Chen-Cleavage-Quarz association18867067478805j27bnv76719861:24000
Sumine-Chen-Hapgood association57660653270911hxw4nv76719861:24000
Chen-Lerrow-Cotant association18835366478802j277nv76719861:24000
Ebic-Manard-Chen association30105324478870j29fnv76719861:24000
Chen-Quarz-Linkup association18854793478804j279nv76719861:24000
Chen-Cotant-Arcia association18793723478798j273nv76719861:24000
McIvey-Chen-Tweener association2193630478833j287nv76719861:24000
Chen-McIvey-Arcia association18892663478808j27fnv76719861:24000
Chen-Ebic-Blackleg association18751834478795j270nv76719861:24000
Chen-Sharesnout-Keman association3044173432709012w2w3nv76719861:24000
Chen-Graley-Quarz association188817304788072t6whnv76719861:24000
Bregar-Graley-Chen association18061508478777j26fnv76719861:24000
Chen-Graley association18871344478806j27cnv76719861:24000
Loncan-Chen-Dehana association950673132709052w2vnnv76719861:24000
Chen-Bregar-Loncan association1877672478797j272nv76719861:24000
Graley-Chen-McIvey association43057629282642w2tsnv76719861:24000
Thacker-Chen-Sharesnout complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes17432232708962w2swnv76719861:24000
Vitale-Ebic-Chen association3000277478869j29dnv76719861:24000
Chen-Sumine-Tusel association18721413270912hxvxnv76719861:24000
Alyan-Chen-Rock outcrop association13205593475205hyh6nv76919861:24000
Borda variant-Glean-Chen association123420644000pm46nv77319811:24000
Pernty-Chen association29039916977941tzpknv77319811:24000
Lerrow-Chen-Vetagrande association6898240644572pmqnnv77319811:24000
Sumine-Chen-Rock outcrop association142322765479465j2xmnv77519851:24000
Chen-Slaven-Chen, cobbly, association2629125479568j30ynv77519851:24000
Chen-Singletree-Jivas association42412885479835j39knv77619831:63360
Quarz-Chen-Duff association81310895479891j3ccnv77619831:63360
Chen-Ramires association, steep4222785479833j39hnv77619831:63360
Chen-Ramires association, moderately steep4232610479834j39jnv77619831:63360
Chen-Pie Creek-Ramires association425760479836j39lnv77619831:63360
Hackwood-Chen-Successloop association186024522156552dckrnv77820131:24000
Atlow-Chen-Pioche association403213113480116j3lmnv77920041:24000
Pioche-Chen association30524773480003j3gznv77920041:24000
Pioche-Chen-Cropper association30424217480002j3gynv77920041:24000
Graley-Chen-McIvey association30413935480001j3gxnv77920041:24000
Chen-Graley association13712913479976j3g3nv77920041:24000
Chen-Rock outcrop association13702314479975j3g2nv77920041:24000
Birchcreek-Segura-Chen association145116360480272j3rnnv78019901:24000
Chen-Segura-McIvey association139012401480258j3r6nv78019901:24000
Chen-McIvey-Birchcreek association13927049480260j3r8nv78019901:24000
Chen-Tusel association13915862480259j3r7nv78019901:24000
McIvey-Chen-Suak association5644515480526j40vnv78019901:24000
Hackwood-Chen-Successloop association18603160480333j3tmnv78019901:24000
Suak-Chen-Rock outcrop association17012372114451017dypnv78420061:24000
Chen-Erakatak-Lambring complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes2471133116897571tqb9or63520061:24000
Leevan-Fitzwater-Chen complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes40865716899131tqhbor63520061:24000
Chen-Arcia complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes2381991622190152dh24or64420211:24000
Chen-Erakatak complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes4321755728446482v4zkor64420211:24000
Chen-Arcia complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes468852630598612wz67or64420211:24000
Erakatak-Chen complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes475789531348302wz68or64420211:24000
Erakatak-Chen-Bregar complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes445593729868522wz5for64420211:24000
Leevan-Chen complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes469462530598622wz66or64420211:24000
Graley-Chen-McIvey association77286513897131hn3gut61119921:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHEN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .