Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHECKETT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHECKETT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHECKETT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHECKETT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHECKETT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHECKETT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHECKETT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHECKETT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHECKETT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHECKETT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHECKETT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CHECKETT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Washoe-Checkett-Mulett families association, 30 to 60 percent slopes.18532269471601htqyca76319841:24000
Mulett-Checkett families-Rock outcrop, granitic complex, 60 to 80 percent slopes.144560471560htpmca76319841:24000
Majorsplace-Checkett-Grube association243221224205422m7s0nv70820091:24000
Majorsplace-Checkett-Grube association2432106826326472rfx5nv70920121:24000
Checkett extremely gravelly loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes1706328424806192p88znv71320141:24000
Chiefrange-Checkett association1704227324806182p88ynv71320141:24000
Chiefrange-Checkett association1704150124840742pcwfnv75419921:24000
Checkett-Majorsplace association32601127922478862fg3gnv77820131:24000
Majorsplace-Grandeposit-Checkett association3682923426326372rfwrnv77820131:24000
Majorsplace-Checkett-Grube association2432222724855332pfdhnv77820131:24000
Checkett extremely gravelly loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes325635822156872dclsnv77820131:24000
Tarnach-Checkett association402013472480109j3ldnv77920041:24000
Checkett extremely gravelly loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes32567999480044j3j9nv77920041:24000
Checkett-Majorsplace association3260653128172432tzhgnv77920041:24000
Checkett-Grube association32585109480045j3jbnv77920041:24000
Majorsplace-Checkett-Grube association2432388728172362tzh5nv77920041:24000
Checkett-Grube-Rock outcrop association1328877479969j3fwnv77920041:24000
Majorsplace-Grandeposit-Checkett association368232428172752tzjwnv78319911:24000
Checkett, moist-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 40 percent slopesCdE1754482478j61tut60819811:24000
Checkett-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes1160771482113j5p1ut61119921:24000
Hiko Peak-Checkett complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes237170482127j5phut61119921:24000
Tarnach-Checkett association84564713897181hn3mut61119921:24000
Checkett family-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes911414731839192x4hkut6171:24000
Checkett-Theon families association, 2 to 40 percent slopes118428531838352whr3ut6171:24000
Checkett-Hiko Peak families complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes81539731839082x4h6ut6171:24000
Checkett-Saxby families-Rock outcrop association, 5 to 50 percent slopes10946431838342whr2ut6171:24000
Checkett family, 3 to 15 percent slopes7942131838972x4gvut6171:24000
Hiko Peak-Checkett families association, 2 to 50 percent slopes33704631838572whrwut6171:24000
Checkett-Amtoft complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes281270481819j5ckut61819951:24000
Red Butte, dry-Checkett-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes144356022204662djkyut6261:24000
Hoye-Hiko Peak, south-Checkett association, 15 to 50 percent slopes152410624255472mdzgut6281:24000
Hoye-Hiko Peak, extremely stony-Checkett, extremely stony association, 15 to 50 percent slopes.152311725045432r81but6291:24000
Checkett-Rock land associationCR11295482386j5yvut63219701:20000
Checkett-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes34854935483872j7hsut63419971:24000
Chuska-Checkett gravelly loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes34938177483873j7htut63419971:24000
Checkett-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes34735087483871j7hrut63419971:24000
Radec-Checkett association, 8 to 25 percent slopes45823473483997j7mtut63419971:24000
Checkett gravelly loam, 5 to 40 percent slopes34616751483870j7hqut63419971:24000
Deerlodge-Checkett gravelly loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes3627633483888j7j9ut63419971:24000
Lucero-Checkett complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes4075467483938j7kxut63419971:24000
Saxby-Rock outcrop-Checkett complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes4724201484013j7nbut63419971:24000
Dixie-Checkett complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes3714044483898j7jmut63419971:24000
Breko-Checkett families-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes118581642mj7nut6491:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHECKETT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .