Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHATANIKA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHATANIKA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHATANIKA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
23104N0971S2004AK090004Chatanika6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties64.814888,-148.0432434

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHATANIKA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHATANIKA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHATANIKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHATANIKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHATANIKA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHATANIKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHATANIKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHATANIKA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CHATANIKA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Chatanika mucky silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes1049294692869r7zmak61020031:25000
Chatanika mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes1038535692868r7zlak61020031:25000
Chatanika-Goldstream complex1078081692905r80sak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes1454849692913r811ak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes1464704692914r812ak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes1471605692915r813ak61020031:25000
Chatanika mucky silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes1051291692870r7znak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes148220692916r814ak61020031:25000
Chatanika mucky silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes10641692871r7zpak61020031:25000
Saulich and Chatanika soils, 3 to 15 percent slopes81V23832520001r3fak65020061:24000
Saulich and Chatanika soils, 15 to 20 percent slopes81X8912520011r3gak65020061:24000
Chatanika-Goldstream complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes2116528510911q53ak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes411B5336510961q58ak65020061:24000
Chatanika silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes40B5111510561q3zak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes411C3863510971q59ak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes411D3252519901r33ak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes411A1811511181q5zak65020061:24000
Chatanika silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes40A1765510551q3yak65020061:24000
Chatanika silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes40C559510571q40ak65020061:24000
Chatanika silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes40D141511091q5pak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes31MN0619066202559325zsqak65520071:25000
Chatanika silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes31CH0214339202555925zrmak65520071:25000
Chatanika-Goldstream complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes31CH0412468202556125zrpak65520071:25000
Chatanika silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes31CH016865202555825zrlak65520071:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes31MN074169202559425zsrak65520071:25000
Chatanika silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes31CH031800202556025zrnak65520071:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes31MN08234202559525zssak65520071:25000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHATANIKA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .