Soil Data Explorer - CHASTAIN

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHASTAIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHASTAIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHASTAIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
133A	81P0198	81GA175002	Chastain	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.4321175,-82.819313
133A	81P0201	81GA175005	Chastain	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.4915619,-82.889595
133A	S88SC005-8	S1988SC005003	Chastain	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.8929372,-81.4495525
133A	S90SC069-30	S1995SC069013	Chastain	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	34.5543286,-79.7970081
133A	08N0438	S2008SC085017-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.8472214,-80.5727768
133A	08N0431	S2008SC085022-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.8827782,-80.5736084
133A	08N0429	S2008SC085024-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.6969452,-80.5455551
133A	08N0428	S2008SC085025-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.6980553,-80.5400009
135A	40A3964	S1965MS115001	CHASTAIN	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	34.2751312,-89.1022797
135A	40A3959	S1965MS115002	CHASTAIN	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	34.3087387,-89.1220016
137	81P0195	81GA033003	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.1876526,-81.7870636
153A	08N0425	S2008SC085028-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	34.0158348,-79.9369431
153A	08N0422	S2008SC085031-Chastain	Chastain	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	34.0377769,-79.9905548

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHASTAIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHASTAIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHASTAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHASTAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHASTAIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHASTAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHASTAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHASTAIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. AR-2012-05-08-03 | Bradley County - April 1961

   General soil areas (Soil Survey of Bradley County, Arkansas; April 1961).

2. MS-2012-04-27-04 | Tippah County - February 1966

   Distribution and pattern of major soils in Wilcox-Dulac-Falkner association (Soil Survey of Tippah County, Mississippi; February 1966).

3. OK-2012-02-17-34 | Pittsburg County - May 1971

   Major soils and underlying material in soil associations 5 and 6 (Soil Survey of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma; May 1971).

Map Units

Map units containing CHASTAIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Eunola-Chastain association	13	4400	328651	c0zn	al031	1976	1:20000
Chastain and Bibb soils	Cb	4317	329621	c1zy	al061	1973	1:20000
Chastain clay	Ch	904	329657	c213	al063	2013	1:
Chastain soils	Cc	4551	330892	c39y	al101	1958	1:20000
Chastain silty clay	Ch	22306	565151	lz2p	ar011	1959	1:20000
Chastain-Tawcaw association	CC	2650	324567	bwqx	ga033	1982	1:20000
Chastain and Tawcaw soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CAA	19715	1701092	1v33y	ga103	2007	1:24000
Chastain loam	Ch	25	124818	45wd	ga215	1980	1:15840
Chewacla-Chastain association	CC	4280	324865	bx1j	ga245	1979	1:15840
Chastain loam	Ca	2250	324867	bx1l	ga245	1979	1:15840
Chastain and Tawcaw soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CAA	27335	2580362	2qbf4	ga251	2011	1:24000
Chastain loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	ChA	825	2425339	2mdrr	ga259	2009	1:12000
Wahee (Tawcaw) and Coxville (Chastain) soils	WW	10440	125152	4675	ga601	1969	1:20000
Chastain-Tawcaw complex, frequently flooded	Ch	4730	125163	467j	ga602	1983	1:20000
Leaf and Chastain soils	Lid	2435	325208	bxdl	ga608	1965	1:20000
Tawcaw-Chastain association, frequently flooded	TC	28928	325404	bxlx	ga610	1992	1:20000
Chastain loam, frequently flooded	Ch	1486	126172	4792	ga620	1992	1:20000
Chewacla-Chastain-Riverview association	CC	19895	325759	bxzc	ga634	1980	1:20000
Chastain silty clay loam, frequently flooded	Ch	3740	325825	by1h	ga638	1987	1:20000
Chastain and Leaf soils	Cls	8110	325884	by3d	ga640	1965	1:15840
Tawcaw-Chastain-Congaree association, frequently flooded	TC	22595	325978	by6f	ga641	1986	1:20000
Tawcaw-Chastain association	TC	23247	125827	46xy	ga644	1980	1:20000
Coxville (Chastain) and Duplin (Tawcaw) soils	Cod	35250	326049	by8q	ga647	1970	1:20000
Chewacla-Chastain association	Cc	14630	326339	byl2	ga654	1979	1:20000
Chastain silt loam (una)	Ca	11440	331825	c491	ms013	1963	1:15840
Chastain silty clay loam (una)	Ch	11430	331826	c492	ms013	1963	1:15840
Chastain soils, (una)	Ch	2393	334177	c6qx	ms139	1963	1:15840
Chewacla and Chastain soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CmA	5866	114507	3v4s	nc007	1999	1:24000
Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded	Ch	6351	115474	3w4z	nc017	1983	1:24000
Chastain and Chenneby soils, frequently flooded	Ch	1221	115636	3wb6	nc047	1986	1:24000
Chastain and Bibb soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CbA	36640	113026	3sm0	nc083	1995	1:24000
Wehadkee-Chastain association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ww	12246	113572	3t5m	nc101	1986	1:24000
Chastain silt loam, frequently flooded	Ch	27078	111122	3qml	nc117	1985	1:24000
Chastain silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CkA	277	2233564	2dz6g	nc123	2007	1:24000
Chastain silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ch	7774	114031	3tnf	nc131	1988	1:24000
Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded	Ch	10423	116161	3ww4	nc141	1986	1:24000
Tawcaw-Chastain complex, frequently flooded	Tc	16332	132398	4frx	sc005	1989	1:20000
Chastain association, frequently flooded	CS	5500	131946	4f9b	sc015	1974	1:20000
Chewacla-Chastain complex, frequently flooded	Cm	22424	132002	4fc4	sc025	1989	1:20000
Chastain-Chewacla complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded	CeA	14277	618792	nrx1	sc031	1998	1:24000
Wehadkee-Chastain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded	WcA	2273	620385	ntkf	sc031	1998	1:24000
Chewacla-Chastain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CmA	207	618798	nrx7	sc031	1998	1:24000
Chastain loam, frequently flooded	Ch	4000	129739	4c04	sc033	1976	1:20000
Chastain-Chewacla-Congaree association, frequently flooded	Ch	18485	129946	4c6t	sc041	1969	1:20000
Wehadkee-Chastain association, frequently flooded	Wk	11019	129992	4c89	sc041	1969	1:20000
Chastain silty clay loam	56	29240	639594	pgk2	sc043	1980	1:20000
Tawcaw-Chastain complex, frequently flooded	Tc	11521	130130	4cdr	sc049	1990	1:20000
Tawcaw-Chastain association	TC	12295	132582	4fyv	sc053	1975	1:20000
Chewacla-Chastain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	ChA	5095	1606524	1qxqc	sc061	2005	1:24000
Chastain-Chewacla complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	CcA	2160	1606522	1qxq9	sc061	2005	1:24000
Tawcaw-Chastain association, frequently flooded	TC	38645	130590	4cwl	sc067	1975	1:20000
Chastain-Chenneby complex, frequently flooded	Ce	22992	130614	4cxc	sc069	1995	1:24000
Chastain silty clay loam	Cd	9078	131084	4ddj	sc079	1976	1:20000
Chastain and Tawcaw soils, frequently flooded	CH	29104	131505	4dv3	sc089	1985	1:20000
Chastain soils	Ck	1716	138270	4mwb	sc690	1967	1:24000
Chastain clay, frequently flooded	Ch	7935	131337	4dnp	sc696	1988	1:15840
Chastain silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded	4A	5388	118152	3yyc	va007	1994	1:24000
Bibb-Chastain complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	4A	12466	121022	41xy	va033	1996	1:24000
Chastain silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, ponded	7A	4830	121028	41y4	va033	1996	1:24000
Chastain loam	31	844	118891	3zq6	va041	1974	1:15840
Chastain silt loam	Cg	1277	119217	401q	va087	1973	1:15840
Mantachie-Chastain complex	Mc	888	119254	402x	va087	1973	1:15840
Chastain loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, ponded	8A	9138	705264	rnwg	va175	1996	1:24000
Chastain loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	7A	8162	705263	rnwf	va175	1996	1:24000
Chastain loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	7A	25285	1723034	1vtyr	va183	2006	1:24000
Bibb and Chastain soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	4A	7415	1723025	1vtyg	va183	2006	1:24000
Chastain loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded	9A	52	140079	4prp	va760	2004	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHASTAIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).