Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHASEBURG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHASEBURG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHASEBURG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
104X53-142-1S1982IA105002NEED TO CHANGE ID!Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.2590337,-91.2031605
105UMN1215S1970MN0491215Chaseburg3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.3870811,-92.6162491
105UMN1251S1971MN0451251Chaseburg3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.6454659,-92.2336273
105UMN1541S1972MN1691541Chaseburg3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.120018,-91.9993668
105X22-142-1S1973IA043002Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8409194,-91.5647877
105UMN2082S1975MN055060Chaseburg3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.7058071,-91.3863883
105UMN1960S1975MN1091960Chaseburg3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.9308853,-92.2088776
105X49-142-2S1982IA097001Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.1670252,-90.8930409
105X3-142-1S1986IA005001Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.4914321,-91.4371339
105X49-87-4S1987IA097001Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.1177827,-90.4990928
105X49-87-3S1987IA097002Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0466472,-90.8567213
n/aX49-142-1S1985IA097001Chaseburg2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHASEBURG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHASEBURG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHASEBURG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHASEBURG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHASEBURG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHASEBURG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHASEBURG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHASEBURG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IA-2011-05-31-19 | Dubuque County - 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Fayette-Nordness association (Soil Survey of Dubuque County, Iowa; 1986).

  2. IA-2011-05-31-20 | Dubuque County - 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Fayette-Rozetta-Eleroy association (Soil Survey of Dubuque County, Iowa; 1986).

  3. IA-2011-05-31-23 | Dubuque County - 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Chelsea-Sogn-Lamont association (Soil Survey of Dubuque County, Iowa; 1986).

  4. IA-2011-05-31-24 | Dubuque County - 1986

    A cross section of a typical pattern of soils and underlying material in a landscape controlled by limestone and shale (Soil Survey of Dubuque County, Iowa; 1986).

  5. IA-2011-05-31-50 | Jackson County - 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Fayette-Nordness-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Iowa; 1992).

  6. IA-2011-05-31-51 | Jackson County - 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Downs-Fayette association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Iowa; 1992).

  7. IA-2011-05-31-53 | Jackson County - 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Walford-Atterberry-Downs association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Iowa; 1992).

  8. IA-2011-06-01-01 | Jones County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Fayette-Downs-Exette association (Soil Survey of Jones County, Iowa; 1991).

  9. IA-2011-06-01-03 | Jones County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Fayette-Nordness-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Jones County, Iowa; 1991).

  10. MN-2012-02-06-04 | Olmsted County - March 1980

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Mt. Carroll-Marlean-Arenzville association (Soil Survey of Olmsted County, Minnesota; March 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing CHASEBURG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B19954023452tc4lia00519921:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes14251727747332syk8ia00519921:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B61124042032tc4lia04319791:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes14231727747352syk9ia04319791:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B134494043482tc4lia04519781:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes1421072527747362syk9ia04519781:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes142B10902914145fkrhia04519781:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, channeled, 0 to 2 percent slopes1142588404333fkr0ia04519781:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B31344049792tc4lia05519841:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B129664053752tc4lia06119831:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes142533727747372syk9ia06119831:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B21674056952tc4lia06519751:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes1421258427747342syk8ia09719881:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B91744074502tc4lia09719881:15840
Chaseburg-Perks complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes1282643407448fnzhia09719881:15840
Arenzville-Chaseburg complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes129B127324080862tc4lia10519881:15840
Perks-Chaseburg complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded315761540813830qvsia10519881:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes14246134080892syk8ia10519881:15840
Chaseburg and Judson silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesCb1255322167052ddnmmn04520081:12000
Chaseburg and Judson silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopesCa338122167042ddnlmn04520081:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, 2 to 12 percent slopes, frequently floodedN620B399516758791t7wmmn04920071:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, channeled, 2 to 6 percent slopes1861B2774398239fcdfmn05519811:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes1987274007242syk9mn10919771:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopesChB576622163072tc4nmn15720081:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA573522163062syk9mn15720081:12000
Chaseburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesCaB19322163052dd7qmn15720081:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes1932494290012syk9mn16919871:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, channeled18611584428999gddpmn16919871:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B55292561686h6x7wi01119601:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616C191025616892qr2dwi01119601:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B43942504299h6x7wi02319601:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopesChB12887534702tc4nwi02519721:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B17032504300h6x7wi03320031:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B663099663h6x7wi03519741:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopesChB72414241452tc4nwi04319591:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA641727747412syk9wi04319591:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesChC852424146g7c4wi04319591:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopesChB53724252102tc4nwi04519691:12000
Chaseburg and Arenzville silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesCn7944252122tc4mwi04519691:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, rarely floodedChC101425211g8ghwi04519691:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopes616B618728066342tc4nwi04919601:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA292627747422syk9wi04919601:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616C14528098362qr2dwi04919601:20000
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B12561555h6x7wi05719871:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 2 to 6 percent slopesChB72264247522tc4nwi06519641:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA119227747432syk9wi06519641:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B19322685134h6x7wi08119811:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B23572504301h6x7wi09119981:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, till plain, 1 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally flooded892B402517003851v2d4wi09320061:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B91216910131trmtwi09320061:12000
Chaseburg silt loam, moderately well drained, 0 to 2 percent slopesChA35864231342syk9wi11119771:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B32683485h6x7wi12119691:15840
Chaseburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded616B50892504302h6x7wi12319651:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHASEBURG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .