Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHARLES soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHARLES, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHARLES were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
144B11N6698S10VT019002Charles6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.9666194,-72.3117

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHARLES soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHARLES series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHARLES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHARLES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHARLES share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHARLES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHARLES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHARLES, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ME-2010-09-03-08 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Charles-Medomak-Cornish general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  2. ME-2012-02-03-12 | Oxford County Area - March 1995

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Rumney-Podunk-Medomak general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Oxford County Area, Maine; March 1995).

Map Units

Map units containing CHARLES as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCa413001072synmme00519691:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCb283157712synlme00519691:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedLk30062844712synlme01119741:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCh143185802synlme02719791:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCh27272846942synlme60119831:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedLk22462847712synmme60219671:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedLk57292848482synmme60619661:15840
Charles-Medomak-Cornish associationCG58182849779kjtme61019921:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCa32992849812synlme61019921:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCh11432850872synmme61119881:20000
Charles-Cornish complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCcA336614823401lrhfme61220161:24000
Charles-Cornish complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCC1556744548szrpme61220161:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCb15922857472synlme61319871:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCa10042857462synmme61319871:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedLk123652852262synlme61419601:20000
Charles-Cornish-Wonsqueak complexCC57652853089kwhme61519941:24000
Cornish-Charles-Fryeburg complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesCsB14482853179kwsme61519941:24000
Charles-Cornish-Wonsqueak complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCG156922856709l85me61920051:24000
Charles-Cornish complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesCC1051325498842qtl5me62020111:24000
Charles-Cornish complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesCC1552225498332qtjnme62120111:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded209A22552803922synlnh60720001:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedCkA33817142142synlny03120071:24000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded3A8592829052synlvt00520061:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded3A371314009902synlvt00920121:
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedLe5902819072synlvt01519791:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedLe28902794072synlvt01719751:20000
Charles silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded72A28772835242synlvt01920051:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHARLES soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .