Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CHAMPLAIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CHAMPLAIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CHAMPLAIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CHAMPLAIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CHAMPLAIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHAMPLAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHAMPLAIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CHAMPLAIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CHAMPLAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CHAMPLAIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CHAMPLAIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-04 | Clinton County - 2006

    Typical pattern of deltaic sands and associated soils in the Champlain-Adams-Croghan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Clinton County, New York; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing CHAMPLAIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Champlain loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes35B345916009231qqwpnh6031:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes35C232516009251qqwrnh6031:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 15 to 60 percent slopes35E202216009271qqwtnh6031:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes35A128416009211qqwmnh6031:24000
Champlain loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes35B110152802839dndnh60920071:24000
Champlain-Woodstock complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes290C50662803169dpgnh60920071:24000
Champlain loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes35C45452802829dncnh60920071:24000
Champlain loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes35A45102802809dn9nh60920071:24000
Champlain loamy fine sand, 15 to 60 percent slopes35E35582802819dnbnh60920071:24000
Champlain-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes789B293013800871hb2ynh60920071:24000
Champlain-Woodstock complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes290D23002803159dpfnh60920071:24000
Champlain-Woodstock complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes290B17132803179dphnh60920071:24000
Champlain-Woodstock complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes290E1022803149dpdnh60920071:24000
Champlain fine sand, 3 to 8 percent slopesCgB63002901229qwsny01919951:24000
Champlain fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesCgA28272901219qwrny01919951:24000
Champlain and Adams soils, very steepChF26562901249qwvny01919951:24000
Champlain fine sand, 8 to 15 percent slopesCgC12662901239qwtny01919951:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopesChB2791316437bm8nny03120071:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopesChC1767316438bm8pny03120071:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopesChD1078316439bm8qny03120071:24000
Champlain loamy sand, 25 to 45 percent slopesChE812316440bm8rny03120071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CHAMPLAIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .