Soil Data Explorer - CENTERBURG

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CENTERBURG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CENTERBURG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CENTERBURG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
111B	SA-021	1962-OH147-021	Centerburg	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.0116539,-83.0738907
111E	MW-017	1983OH117017	Centerburg	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.4142472,-82.6805667
144A	40A4129	76VT021002	Centerburg	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.5950012,-73.1230545
n/a	LC-021	1973-OH089-021	Centerburg	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	LC-022	1978-OH089-022	Centerburg	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CENTERBURG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CENTERBURG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CENTERBURG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CENTERBURG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CENTERBURG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CENTERBURG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CENTERBURG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CENTERBURG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. OH-2010-09-29-18 | Fairfield County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bennington-Cardington-Pewamo association (Soil Survey of Fairfield County, Ohio; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing CENTERBURG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	14045	288139	2wvgc	oh005	1976	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	8543	288140	2wvgf	oh005	1976	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	3227	288142	2wp1y	oh005	1976	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	2630	288141	2wvgh	oh005	1976	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	930	2996477	2wvgc	oh033	1975	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	600	1019363	2wp1y	oh033	1975	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	55	2996541	2wvgf	oh033	1975	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes	CfB	38	1019361	136qm	oh033	1975	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	7263	172044	2wvgc	oh041	1997	1:12000
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	1919	172045	2wp1y	oh041	1997	1:12000
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	27293	2996479	2wvgc	oh045	1998	1:12000
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	10808	2996543	2wvgf	oh045	1998	1:12000
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	2928	2996693	2wp1y	oh045	1998	1:12000
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	1797	2996487	2wvgc	oh049	1977	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	724	2996695	2wp1y	oh049	1977	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	401	2996545	2wvgf	oh049	1977	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	CgB	1690	286881	9mj7	oh075	1989	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	CgC2	380	286882	9mj8	oh075	1989	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	7707	2996485	2wvgc	oh077	1988	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	491	2996698	2wp1y	oh077	1988	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	29	2996547	2wvgf	oh077	1988	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	5	2996561	2wvgh	oh077	1988	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	14317	613561	2wvgc	oh083	1983	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	9583	613564	2wp1y	oh083	1983	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	5743	613562	2wvgf	oh083	1983	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	4787	613563	2wvgh	oh083	1983	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	50576	2996483	2wvgc	oh089	1986	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	19192	2996701	2wp1y	oh089	1986	1:15840
Centerburg-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	CfB	1245	171007	5qyc	oh089	1986	1:15840
Centerburg-Urban land complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes	CfC	420	171008	5qyd	oh089	1986	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	2	2996703	2wp1y	oh093	1972	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes	CeB	4094	171186	5r44	oh101	1984	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	10471	288321	2wvgc	oh103	1974	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	5414	288322	2wp1y	oh103	1974	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	22	1412559	2wvgf	oh103	1974	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	34091	2996466	2wvgc	oh117	1986	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	8760	2996707	2wp1y	oh117	1986	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	2725	2996564	2wvgh	oh117	1986	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	6768	537510	2wvgc	oh127	1984	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	15447	2996481	2wvgc	oh139	1971	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	4197	2996553	2wvgf	oh139	1971	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	3524	2996710	2wp1y	oh139	1971	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	3294	2996566	2wvgh	oh139	1971	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	Cen1B1	5058	2996588	2wvgc	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1C2	2412	2996713	2wp1y	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	Cen1B2	1323	287174	2wvgf	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	Cen1C1	715	2996589	2wvgh	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	CuB	212	2216969	2ddy4	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	CuC2	12	2216970	2ddy5	oh169	1981	1:15840
Centerburg silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes	CeB	22	1542645	1ns7r	oh175	1980	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CENTERBURG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).