Soil Data Explorer - CEDARCREEK

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CEDARCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CEDARCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CEDARCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
126	74PA125048	1974PA125048	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.4558333,-80.4188889
127	73PA033020	1973PA033020	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.0580556,-78.4402778
127	73PA033021	1973PA033021	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.0633333,-78.4447222
127	73PA033022	1973PA033022	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.0633333,-78.4447222
127	73PA033024	1973PA033024	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.1761111,-78.5594444
127	74PA033025	1974PA033025	Cedarcreek	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.2352778,-78.6241667

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CEDARCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CEDARCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CEDARCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CEDARCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CEDARCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CEDARCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CEDARCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CEDARCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. VA-2010-11-05-07 | Buchanan County -

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).

2. VA-2010-11-05-16 | Dickenson County - 2009

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

3. VA-2010-11-05-17 | Dickenson County - 2009

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

4. VA-2010-11-05-31 | Russell County - 2007

   Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

5. VA-2012-05-10-04 | Buchanan County - 2009

   An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

6. VA-2012-05-10-05 | Buchanan County - 2009

   An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

7. VA-2012-05-11-02 | Dickenson County - 2009

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

8. VA-2012-05-11-03 | Dickenson County - 2009

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

9. VA-2012-05-11-11 | Russell County - 2007

   Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

10. WV-2012-03-23-03 | Boone County - June 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing CEDARCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Cedarcreek-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes, very stony	uCsrE	110	3158450	2ykst	ky195	1986	1:24000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	CgD	640	2401094	2lljn	md001	2009	1:12000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	CgC	562	2401093	2lljm	md001	2009	1:12000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes	CgE	460	2401095	2lljp	md001	2009	1:12000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes	CgB	379	2401092	2lljl	md001	2009	1:12000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 45 to 65 percent slopes	CgF	121	2401096	2lljq	md001	2009	1:12000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, 25 to 80 percent slopes, very stony	CeF	2478	541785	l5ry	pa009	1989	1:24000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stony	CeC	572	541784	l5rx	pa009	1989	1:24000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, 25 to 80 percent slopes	CrF	3	541871	l5vq	pa009	1989	1:24000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, moderately steep	95D	70307	1482815	1lrzr	pa033	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, strongly sloping	95C	1649	1482814	1lrzq	pa033	1981	1:20000
Strip mine spoil	St	313	540765	l4q1	pa043	1967	1:15840
Cedarcreek very channery loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes	CrC	325	544846	l8yp	pa057	1999	1:24000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, 25 to 80 percent slopes	CrF	325	544847	l8yq	pa057	1999	1:24000
Strip mines	SM	2437	542040	l615	pa061	1974	1:20000
Cedarcreek, Fiveblock, and Kaymine soils, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	3F	12732	1670882	1t2pf	va027	2006	1:24000
Shelocta-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, very bouldery	22E	9435	1670952	1t2rp	va027	2006	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	4C	9231	1670908	1t2q8	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	14E	8589	1670881	1t2pd	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	15C	1681	1670954	1t2rr	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	14E	5871	2399871	2lk86	va051	2008	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	2C	3425	2399853	2lk7m	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	16C	3415	2399873	2lk88	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine, Cedarcreek, and Fiveblock soils, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	15F	3242	2399872	2lk87	va051	2008	1:24000
Shelocta-Cedarcreek complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery	23F	2224	2399884	2lk8m	va051	2008	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	16C	2269	1671905	1t3rf	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	32E	2197	1671899	1t3r7	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	34C	2029	1671897	1t3r5	va167	2006	1:24000
Shelocta-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, very bouldery	48E	1561	1671895	1t3r3	va167	2006	1:24000
Grimsley-Cedarcreek-Berks complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, rocky	25E	3870	522178	kjcg	va185	1996	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Alticrest-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very stony	14E	1508	522174	kjcb	va185	1996	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very stony	15E	885	522185	kjcp	va185	1996	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	15C	715	522183	kjcm	va185	1996	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	15D	124	522184	kjcn	va185	1996	1:24000
Grimsley-Cedarcreek-Berks complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky	25D	120	522177	kjcf	va185	1996	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Alticrest-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	14C	98	522173	kjc9	va185	1996	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	41F	10116	2508567	2q7qh	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	42C	7295	2508568	2q7qj	va195	2010	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	15C	2085	2507485	2q7pg	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KmF	19705	514863	2tqhh	wv005	1988	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	CgF	5535	514853	k8r5	wv005	1988	1:24000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stony	CeB	820	514852	k8r4	wv005	1988	1:24000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, very steep, very stony	CeF	494	516090	kb12	wv015	1998	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ClF	12497	3086622	2w1ww	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed	CfF	6472	3054888	2xph3	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed	CfD	4409	3054887	2xph2	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CmF	3499	3054876	2xb1d	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnD	3461	3054880	2xpgx	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed	CfB	3077	3054886	2xph1	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnF	2111	3054881	2xb1h	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcF	1837	3054873	2xb0l	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ChF	1335	3054879	2xpgw	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnB	510	3086623	2w1wx	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CkD	496	3054882	2xpgz	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CkF	381	3054883	2xph0	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CyD	283	3054885	2xph5	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcD	217	3054872	2xpgt	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CyB	169	3054884	2xph4	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ChD	143	3054878	2xpgy	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcB	48	3054871	2xpgv	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	CeF	141	553372	lktq	wv043	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KmF	134	553373	2tqhh	wv043	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	15960	532217	2tqhh	wv047	1993	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	CrF	2720	532204	kvsw	wv047	1993	1:24000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	CeB	760	532203	kvsv	wv047	1993	1:24000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ChF	509	3054898	2xpgw	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcD	186	3054893	2xpgt	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ChD	113	3054897	2xpgy	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcF	93	3054894	2xb0l	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed	CfD	47	3054900	2xph2	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed	CfB	8	3054899	2xph1	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CcB	5	3054892	2xpgv	wv079	1981	1:20000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, very steep, extremely stony	CeF	517	515110	k90g	wv101	1992	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	7760	513500	2tqhh	wv109	1984	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep	CeF	5565	513489	k7b5	wv109	1984	1:24000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	CcC	837	1384227	1hgdh	wv600	2005	1:24000
Cedarcreek channery loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	CcE	184	1384228	1hgdj	wv600	2005	1:24000
Cedarcreek extremely channery loam, moderately steep	CrD	5766	514041	k7wz	wv602	1965	1:20000
Cedarcreek channery silt loam, steep, stony	CeE	121	514684	k8kq	wv612	1984	1:20000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	290	1155550	2tqhh	wv620	2005	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, very stony	CgF	569	2427124	2mgmb	wv622	2010	1:12000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	CfC	75	2427123	2mgm9	wv622	2010	1:12000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, very stony	CeF	16239	2454321	2ncxn	wv705	2009	1:24000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	CdC	1575	2453243	2nbsw	wv705	2009	1:24000
Cedarcreek very channery loam, very steep, very stony	CdF	1060	2453279	2nbv1	wv705	2009	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	CkF	470	2516664	261cs	wv713		1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb complex, very steep	KcF	4	2516654	261cb	wv713		1:24000
Cedarcreek channery loam, very steep, extremely stony	CeF	4687	2512840	k7ky	wv767	2011	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CEDARCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).