Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CATTCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CATTCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CATTCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/a81P0091S1980WA041001Cattcreek6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CATTCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CATTCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATTCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATTCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CATTCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATTCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATTCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CATTCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-35 | Lewis County Area - May 1987

    Soils formed in eolian tephra from Mount St. Helens (Soil Survey of Lewis County Area, Washington; May 1987).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-36 | Skamania County Area - October 1990

    Geographic locations and profiles of soils adjacent to Mount St. Helens (Soil Survey of Skamania County Area, Washington; October 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing CATTCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rock outcrop-Cattcreek complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes2194740740262h0ywa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, till substratum, 8 to 30 percent slopes313709741022h3dwa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, 30 to 65 percent slopes272622740822h2rwa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery laomy sand, sandstone substratum, 30 to 65 percent slopes292582740992h39wa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, 65 to 90 percent slopes28867740932h33wa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, sandstone substratum, 65 to 90 percent slopes30623741012h3cwa63419861:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, 30 to 65 percent slopes3218692744242hfswa64119801:24000
Cattcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes399247744312hg0wa64119801:24000
Cattcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes404630744332hg2wa64119801:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, 8 to 30 percent slopes313763744232hfrwa64119801:24000
Cattcreek, cold-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes412772744342hg3wa64119801:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, 65 to 90 percent slopes332422744252hftwa64119801:24000
Cattcreek cindery sandy loam, till substratum, 8 to 30 percent slopes371478744292hfywa64119801:24000
Cattcreek cindery sandy loam, till substratum, 30 to 65 percent slopes381098744302hfzwa64119801:24000
Rock outcrop-Cattcreek, cold, complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes183839743362hbywa64119801:24000
Rock outcrop-Cattcreek complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes182643743352hbxwa64119801:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, cold, 30 to 65 percent slopes34559744262hfvwa64119801:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, fragmental substratum, 30 to 65 percent slopes36307744282hfxwa64119801:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, cold, 65 to 90 percent slopes3594744272hfwwa64119801:24000
Rock outcrop-Cattcreek, overblown, cold complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes237419813857441hhzfwa65919871:24000
Rock outcrop-Cattcreek complex, cold, 65 to 90 percent slopes91210313856181hhvcwa65919871:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, cold, 65 to 90 percent slopes20141613855421hhrxwa65919871:24000
Cattcreek very cindery loamy sand, cold, 30 to 65 percent slopes1931913855401hhrvwa65919871:24000
Cattcreek loamy sand, overblown, cold, 65 to 90 percent slopes20421513857151hhyhwa65919871:24000
Cattcreek loamy sand, overblown, cold, 30 to 65 percent slopes20311913857141hhygwa65919871:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CATTCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .