Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CATOOSA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CATOOSA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CATOOSA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
11286P08741986KS001007Catoosa7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.7936111,-95.3483333
112M87013351987MO013035Catoosa4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.2640833,-94.2430556
112M05013042005MO013004Catoosa4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.2065833,-94.1887778
11274KS00300174KS003001Catoosa2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.0666199,-95.2855606
11286P087186KS099004Catoosa7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.230835,-95.4422226
11294KS12500194KS125001Catoosa2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.3788872,-95.819725
11294KS13300194KS133001Catoosa2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.4717941,-95.2902069
11294KS20500194KS205001Catoosa2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.6883888,-95.6044312
11296P0385S1996OK035001CATOOSA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.8636818,-95.3413696
11296P0388S1996OK105001CATOOSA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.7522926,-95.774437
11296P0386S1996OK143005CATOOSA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1275826,-95.8036041
11207N0398S2007KS205001Catoosa7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.6883888,-95.6044464

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CATOOSA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CATOOSA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATOOSA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATOOSA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CATOOSA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATOOSA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATOOSA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CATOOSA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-20-14 | Cherokee County - August 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Parsons-Zaar-Catoosa association (Soil Survey of Cherokee County, Kansas; 1985).

  2. KS-2012-01-20-56 | Elk County - November 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Eram-Kenoma-Catoosa association (Soil Survey of Elk County, Kansas; 1986).

  3. KS-2012-01-23-49 | Labette County - July 1990

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Catoosa-Apperson-Zaar association (Soil Survey of Labette County, Kansas; 1990).

  4. KS-2012-01-26-34 | Wilson County - February 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Catoosa-Shidler-Zaar association (Soil Survey of Wilson County, Kansas; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing CATOOSA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Catoosa-Sogn complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes864923114533982wty1ks01919721:24000
Catoosa silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes86439614533972wty0ks01919721:24000
Catoosa-Sogn complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes86492388914533312wty1ks04919841:24000
Catoosa silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes86431056614533302wty0ks04919841:24000
Claremore-Catoosa complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes263176571339m5j9ok00519771:24000
Catoosa-Claremore complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes183648381797dt91ok01319741:24000
Shidler-Catoosa complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesTsD23401065332zgwmok03519681:20000
Catoosa silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesClC1301064973ktdok03519681:20000
Catoosa-Shidler complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesCmB830383701dw8gok08519631:24000
Catoosa-Shidler complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes73385383975dwk9ok09919821:24000
Catoosa-Shidler-Lula complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes69157623401nxpqok11319751:24000
Catoosa silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNaB49471066682vwfqok13119631:24000
Newtonia-Catoosa complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes261456384812dxf9ok13319761:24000
Catoosa-Shidler-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes645541067392vwfrok14319751:12000
Catoosa silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes519581067332vwfqok14319751:12000
Catoosa-Shidler-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesCcD13111067532vwfrok14519721:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CATOOSA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .