Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CATERL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CATERL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CATERL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
198P0074S1997OR003001Caterl6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.2844429,-123.5991669

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CATERL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CATERL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATERL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATERL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CATERL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATERL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATERL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CATERL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CATERL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Caterl-Laderly-Romanose complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes303370852662vqjor00320041:24000
Caterl-Murtip-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes332643852682vqlor00320041:24000
Caterl-Laderly-Romanose complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes312199852672vqkor00320041:24000
Caterl-Murtip-Giveout complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes321480852652vqhor00320041:24000
Caterl-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes9E176146093821dror00719841:20000
Murtip-Caterl complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes47E86336089521ccor00719841:20000
Caterl-Laderly complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes9D67206093721dqor00719841:20000
Murtip-Caterl complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, bouldery48E21046089621cdor00719841:20000
Laderly-Caterl complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes37F9356088221byor00719841:20000
Caterl gravelly silt loam, 30 to 60 percent north slopes11E4266094321dxor00919831:20000
Caterl gravelly silt loam, 30 to 60 percent south slopes12E3906094421dyor00919831:20000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes70E332396722527ykor05720061:24000
Caterl-Laderly-Murtip complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes16F270796717927x2or05720061:24000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes70D164336714127vvor05720061:24000
Laderly-Caterl-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes60F49226718527x8or05720061:24000
Laderly-Rock outcrop-Caterl complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes61F37006718427x7or05720061:24000
Caterl-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes309E16206723727yyor05720061:24000
Caterl-Murtip complex, clayey, 5 to 30 percent slopes72D11546723027yqor05720061:24000
Caterl very cobbly medial loam, till substratum, 30 to 60 percent slopes157E6746718227x5or05720061:24000
Caterl-Laderly-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes60E1386717827x1or05720061:24000
Caterl very cobbly medial loam, till substratum, 5 to 30 percent slopes157D1286723227ysor05720061:24000
Murtip-Caterl complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes347E1126719527xlor05720061:24000
Caterl-Laderly complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes309D956725527zjor05720061:24000
Caterl very cobbly medial loam, till substratum, 60 to 90 percent slopes157F77672792809or05720061:24000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes66F820517236571vvlvor06719751:20000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes66E603917236521vvlpor06719751:20000
Caterl-Laderly-Murtip complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes67G387017236591vvlxor06719751:20000
Caterl-Murtip complex, clayey, 5 to 30 percent slopes71E48817236641vvm2or06719751:20000
Caterl gravelly silt loam, 30 to 60 percent south slopes55F27761545221bor06719751:20000
Braun-Scaponia silt loams, 60 to 90 percent north slopes56G22561546221cor06719751:20000
Caterl gravelly silt loam, 30 to 60 percent north slopes54F19615442219or06719751:20000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes70E3545271119527ykor07119671:24000
Murtip-Caterl-Laderly complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes70D2645271118427vvor07119671:24000
Caterl-Laderly-Murtip complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes16F712271118727x2or07119671:24000
Laderly-Rock outcrop-Caterl complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes61F128281675227x7or07119671:24000
Laderly-Caterl-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes60F68281675327x8or07119671:24000
Caterl-Laderly-Romanose complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes406G43114215201jq6hor63719811:20000
Caterl-Laderly-Romanose complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes405F35914215191jq6gor63719811:20000
Caterl-Murtip-Laderly complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes425F11614215221jq6kor63719811:20000
Murtip-Caterl complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes39G229564681259hor63819901:20000
Caterl-Laderly gravelly loams, 30 to 65 percent slopes10G212564602256yor63819901:20000
Murtip-Caterl complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes39E169064680259gor63819901:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CATERL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .