Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CATASKA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CATASKA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CATASKA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
130B04N0777S2004NC173002Cataska4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.4303818,-83.4860001

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CATASKA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CATASKA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATASKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATASKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CATASKA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CATASKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CATASKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CATASKA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TN-2010-11-02-19 | McMinn County - 2004

    Relationship of soils and parent material in the Tellico-Red Hills-Nonaburg and Lostcove-Unicoi-Cataska general soil map units (Soil Survey of McMinn County, Tennessee; 2004).

  2. TN-2012-03-19-26 | McMinn County - 2004

    Relationship of soils and parent material in the Tellico-Red Hills-Nonaburg and Lostcove-Unicoi-Cataska general soil map units (Soil Survey of McMinn County, TN; 2004).

Map Units

Map units containing CATASKA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cataska channery loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes, very rockyCeG126716112171r2lrga01520131:12000
Cataska channery silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes, very rockyCaG5235202385825xzrga12920071:12000
Cataska-Junaluska complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesCbF4975202385725xzqga12920071:12000
Cataska-Junaluska complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesCbE4265202385625xzpga12920071:12000
Junaluska-Cataska complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesJcF1635531773kvbzga63719901:20000
Junaluska-Cataska complex, 45 to 90 percent slopesJcG1175531774kvc0ga63719901:20000
Junaluska-Cataska complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesJcE675531772kvbyga63719901:20000
Cataska channery silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopesCkG13105562964lwt4ga64820011:12000
Cataska channery silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesCkF980562963lwt3ga64820011:12000
Cataska channery silt loam, 5 to 25 percent slopesCkE225562962lwt2ga64820011:12000
Cataska-Sylco-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very stonyCdF42516719771t3trnc02120061:12000
Cataska-Sylco complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rockyCaE6416719761t3tqnc02120061:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockySyF2120524231672vx4lnc03920091:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rockySyE584024231662vx4fnc03920091:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rockySyD100524231652vx4bnc03920091:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopesSxF2672546456lbmmnc04319911:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesSxE10885464552vx4dnc04319911:12000
Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 95 percent slopesCbF365546390lbkhnc04319911:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesSxD93546454lbmknc04319911:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockySyF1387919127862vx4lnc07520071:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rockySyE218019127852vx4fnc07520071:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rockySyD133119127842vx4bnc07520071:12000
Cataska-Sylco complex, 50 to 95 percent slopesCcF3560545804l9ylnc11319901:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesSxE12625458712vx4dnc11319901:12000
Rock outcrop-Cataska complex, 30 to 95 percent slopesRhF639545856lb08nc11319901:12000
Cataska-Sylco-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very stonyCfF760516713281t34tnc11520061:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rockySwE151016714412vx4gnc11520061:12000
Rock outcrop-Cataska complex, 30 to 95 percent slopes, very stonyRcF40716714241t37xnc11520061:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rockySwD31316714422vx4cnc11520061:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopesTcG109123903972l7dlnc17519681:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockyStF762119126242vx4lnc60520071:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very rockyStE150419126232vx4fnc60520071:12000
Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very stonyCbF490623189nxgwnc60520071:12000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rockyStD22019126222vx4bnc60520071:12000
Soco-Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopesSmF1586546803lbztnc60619911:12000
Rock outcrop-Cataska complex, 50 to 95 percent slopesRgF964546794lbzjnc60619911:12000
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCcF60565264362v0x9tn01920001:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopesCcG18035264372v0xbtn01920001:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopes11G341723959172v0xbtn05919541:15840
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 80 percent slopes24G238723959382vx4ktn05919541:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopes11F106723959162v0x9tn05919541:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes11E81223959152v0xctn05919541:15840
Sylco-Cataska complex, 35 to 50 percent slopes24F45223959372vx4htn05919541:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCcF30465265192v0x9tn09120001:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopesCcG22255265202v0xbtn09120001:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCcE19705265182v0xctn09120001:24000
Cataska very channery loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes, very rockyCaG838526201knk7tn10719991:24000
Cataska very channery loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes, very rockyCaF72526198knk4tn10719991:24000
Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopesCcF1411527856kq8mtn12319741:20000
Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 65 percent slopesCaF5491523735kkzptn13919971:24000
Cataska-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopesCaG5076523736kkzqtn13919971:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCaF17235300552v0x9tn16319911:20000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopesCaG8255300562v0xbtn16319911:20000
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCaE7525300542v0xctn16319911:20000
Cataska cobbly loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCcF88530057kskmtn16319911:20000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 80 percent slopes24G133324013342vx4ktn17119801:24000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 35 to 50 percent slopes24F89924013332vx4htn17119801:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes11E23424013192v0xctn17119801:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopes11G13224013212v0xbtn17119801:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopes11F4924013202v0x9tn17119801:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopesCaG392716896332v0xbtn17919551:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCaF106816896322v0x9tn17919551:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCaE96616896312v0xctn17919551:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesCaF148315247632v0x9tn60620011:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 50 to 80 percent slopesCaG94055247642v0xbtn60620011:24000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 50 to 80 percent slopesSyG77435248352vx4ktn60620011:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesCaE40635247622v0xctn60620011:24000
Sylco-Cataska complex, 35 to 50 percent slopesSyF23905248342vx4htn60620011:24000
Cataska-Sylco complex, 25 to 80 percent slopesCcE39354529682ks5jtn60820011:24000
Junaluska-Cataska complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesJcD16402529689ks5rtn60820011:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 25 to 80 percent slopesCaE11340529681ks5htn60820011:24000
Cataska channery silt loam, 12 to 25 percent slopesCaD3028529680ks5gtn60820011:24000
Soco-Cataska complex, 25 to 80 percent slopes, erodedSoE116529706ks69tn60820011:24000
Cataska-Sylco complex, 30 to 95 percent slopes, very rockyCcF18004553554ll0ltn64020071:24000
Cataska-Hartleton very stony loams, 25 to 60 percent slopes11E3500516298kb7sva00319811:15840
Cataska-Hartleton very stony loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes11D610516297kb7rva00319811:15840
Hartleton-Cataska very stony loams, 7 to 15 percent slopes35C500516357kb9pva00319811:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes16E5624517525kcjcva01519781:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes16F3559517528kcjgva01519781:15840
Cataska very stony silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes17E1623517542kcjxva01519781:15840
Cataska-Cardiff slaty loams, 15 to 45 percent slopes7D2131516584kbk0va04319801:15840
Cataska very stony silt loam, 25 to 75 percent slopesCaE364516876kbvfva07919831:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes8E2318518870kdxrva18719801:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes8D1331518869kdxqva18719801:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes8C245518868kdxpva18719801:15840
Cataska channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes16E2730258162xd5dva8201:12000
Cataska silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stony17E1030258022xd5fva8201:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CATASKA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .