Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CASCAJO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CASCAJO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CASCAJO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CASCAJO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CASCAJO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CASCAJO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CASCAJO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CASCAJO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CASCAJO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CASCAJO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CASCAJO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CO-2011-05-27-10 | Otero County - 1972

    Rocky Ford-Numa-Kornman soil association (Soil Survey of Otero County, Colorado; 1972).

  2. CO-2011-05-27-19 | Prowers County - 1966

    Cross sections showing relationships of the soils to the landscape and to the underlying geologic formations in Prowers County. The upper cross section shows relationships in the western part of the county, and the lower shows those in the eastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Prowers County, Colorado; 1966).

Map Units

Map units containing CASCAJO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 20 percent slopesCaE489532237452t50zco01119651:15840
Cascajo soils and gravelly landCa325694235351vco01119651:15840
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 20 percent slopesCa2351943572t50zco02519651:15840
Cascajo-Midway, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 30 percent slopesGs985943622t513co02519651:15840
Cascajo soils and gravelly landCa44831104053pwgco08719651:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 20 percent slopesCg9069947212t50zco08919661:15840
Numa-Cascajo complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes, very rarely floodedNvD134326111842rgs3co08919661:15840
Cascajo sandy loam, 3 to 25 percent slopesCdE220249479735mzco09919631:15840
Cascajo gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes20204879511135z3co61719801:24000
Cascajo gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes13164795190361nco61819761:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 20 percent slopesCaE26155954852t50zco62619741:24000
Cascajo-Midway, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 1 to 30 percent slopesCsE8053954862t513co62619741:24000
Kim-Cascajo complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes273427496462jnlxco62719801:24000
Midway, dry-Cascajo complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes1207832237542t511co62719801:24000
Kimera-Cascajo complex, 1 to 12 percent slopesK2D46331053582t51wco62820081:24000
Midway, dry-Cascajo complex, 2 to 40 percent slopesMC202532237562t511co62820081:24000
Midway, dry-Cascajo complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes7260264983412t511co63719861:24000
Kimera-Cascajo complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes5257184983192t51wco63719861:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 40 percent slopes1617904982792t510co63719861:24000
Cascajo variant gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes171474498280jqhkco63719861:24000
Harvey-Cascajo association, 5 to 15 percent slopes5433134564431wqrnm65619871:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes479700564361wqjnm65619871:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes44962633571141xfdnm66419841:24000
Cascajo-Taluce-Badland complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes122325241044783hq8wy03119981:24000
Cascajo-Taluce-Badland complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes118460916696661t1f6wy60920061:24000
Cascajo very gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 30 percent slopes, very stony240529119042w7jbwy6291:24000
Cascajo-Larimer-like, occasionally ponded-Kamms-like complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes213932532432ztj1wy6291:24000
Vonid-Cascajo-Zigweid complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes113232066322zc4hwy6291:24000
Robertsondraw-Cascajo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes215732505052zv7wwy6291:24000
Clapper-Cascajo-Eaglenest complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes223631328322yn92wy6291:24000
Cascajo-Remmit-like-Claprych complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes223929119772y4z0wy6291:24000
Cascajo-Taluce-Badland complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes372514148071jh6ywy71519741:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CASCAJO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .