Soil Data Explorer - CARNEGIE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CARNEGIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CARNEGIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CARNEGIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
133A	86P0182	85GA261006	Carnegie	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	32.0102768,-84.3958359
n/a	79P0193	79GA071001	Carnegie	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	79P0196	79GA277001	Carnegie	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CARNEGIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CARNEGIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARNEGIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARNEGIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CARNEGIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARNEGIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARNEGIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CARNEGIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. FL-2012-04-26-27 | Washington County - May 1965

   Geologic formations of Washington County and the position of most soil series (Soil Survey of Washington County, Florida; May 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing CARNEGIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CgB	7739	328115	c0fc	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CgC	2774	328117	c0ff	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	CgB2	2761	328116	c0fd	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CgC2	2543	328118	c0fg	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	CgA	1853	328114	c0fb	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes	CgD	651	328119	c0fh	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	CgD2	520	328120	c0fj	al003	1961	1:20000
Carnegie fine sandy loam, eroded, very gently sloping	CaB2	238	328966	c19t	al045	1958	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CnB	1855	324521	2tbym	ga031	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	1825	324524	2tddf	ga031	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoB2	1525	324523	2tbyn	ga031	1965	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CnC	590	324522	bwpg	ga031	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoD2	105	324525	2tbyd	ga031	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	2436	324569	2tddf	ga033	1982	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	2100	324568	2tdq8	ga033	1982	1:20000
Carnegie gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CaC	1630	754248	2wz3f	ga087	2001	1:24000
Carnegie gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CaB	350	754247	2wyxg	ga087	2001	1:24000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoB2	1820	324621	2tbyn	ga095	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	1310	324622	2tddf	ga095	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	5895	324756	2tbyn	ga107	1993	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	5720	324757	2tddf	ga107	1993	1:20000
Carnegie gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CaC	7782	336602	2wz3f	ga131	2000	1:12000
Carnegie gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CaB	1929	336601	2wyxg	ga131	2000	1:12000
Carnegie loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	CnB2	920	324793	bwz6	ga165	1966	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CnC2	735	324794	bwz7	ga165	1966	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CoC2	1845	124918	45zm	ga229	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	CoB2	1200	124917	45zl	ga229	1965	1:20000
Carnegie-Nankin complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CkC2	7675	581298	mhwk	ga243	2002	1:24000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	2170	581299	2tbyn	ga243	2002	1:24000
Carnegie-Nankin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded	CkD2	1495	581297	mhwj	ga243	2002	1:24000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	2914	324927	2tddf	ga277	1979	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	1883	324926	2tdq8	ga277	1979	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CaC	13765	325097	2tbyp	ga321	1985	1:20000
Carnegie gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CbB	5475	325099	2wyxg	ga321	1985	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes	CaD	420	325098	bx91	ga321	1985	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CnB	4250	125124	4668	ga601	1969	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CnC	3785	125125	4669	ga601	1969	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	CeB2	26350	125161	467g	ga602	1983	1:20000
Carnegie-Cowarts complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CgC2	21695	125162	467h	ga602	1983	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	3975	325140	2tddf	ga603	1981	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	1410	325139	2tdq8	ga603	1981	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	11347	325188	2tddf	ga608	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoB2	4765	325186	2tbyn	ga608	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoD2	922	325189	2tbyd	ga608	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	CoC	507	325187	2tbyp	ga608	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded	CkC3	435	325185	bxcv	ga608	1965	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CoC2	3030	125341	46f8	ga609	1967	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CoB	1180	125340	46f7	ga609	1967	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	15139	325366	2tbyn	ga610	1992	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	12689	325367	2tddf	ga610	1992	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	13040	325417	2tddf	ga612	1975	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	1995	325416	2tbyn	ga612	1975	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	3370	325461	2tddf	ga615	1981	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	1350	325460	2tdq8	ga615	1981	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaD2	1290	325462	2tbyd	ga615	1981	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	9645	325519	2tddf	ga617	1976	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaD2	1375	325520	2tbyd	ga617	1976	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	10365	325546	2tddf	ga627	1970	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoD2	810	325547	2tbyd	ga627	1970	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	1196	325822	2tddf	ga638	1987	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	851	325821	2tdq8	ga638	1987	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaB2	5415	325940	2tbyn	ga641	1986	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CaC2	3420	325941	2tddf	ga641	1986	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	15265	326048	2tddf	ga647	1970	1:20000
Carnegie loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	CnB	10650	326047	2tbym	ga647	1970	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoC2	10325	326243	2tddf	ga652	1969	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoD2	6255	326244	2tbyd	ga652	1969	1:20000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, moderately eroded	CoB2	1615	326242	2tbyn	ga652	1969	1:20000
Carnegie-Nankin complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	CkC2	1300	1605071	1qw6h	ga658	2005	1:24000
Carnegie-Nankin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded	CkD2	445	1605072	1qw6j	ga658	2005	1:24000
Carnegie sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	CaB2	205	1605070	1qw6g	ga658	2005	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CARNEGIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).