Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CARBENGLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CARBENGLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CARBENGLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
86B08N0704MLRA86-CARBENGLE-S08TX149001CARBENGLE7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.933239,-96.7542648

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CARBENGLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CARBENGLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARBENGLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARBENGLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CARBENGLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CARBENGLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CARBENGLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CARBENGLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-02-31 | Colorado County - 2006

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hallettsville-Frelsburg-Carbengle general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Colorado County, Texas; 2006).

  2. TX-2010-11-03-08 | Fayette County - 2004

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hallettsville-Straber-Dubina general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Fayette County, Texas; 2004).

  3. TX-2010-11-03-09 | Fayette County - 2004

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Frelsburg-Carbengle general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Fayette County, Texas; 2004).

  4. TX-2010-11-03-16 | Gonzales County - 2006

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Carbengle-Shiner-Frelsburg general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Gonzales County, Texas; 2006).

  5. TX-2012-03-21-26 | Lavaca County - December 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Denhawken-Elmendorf-Hallettsville map unit (Soil Survey of Lavaca County, TX; 1992).

  6. TX-2012-03-21-27 | Lavaca County - December 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Carbengle-Frelsburg map unit (Soil Survey of Lavaca County, TX; 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing CARBENGLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Carbengle sandy clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCbC55443642602sshmtx08919971:24000
Carbengle sandy clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesCbD28953642612v1v5tx08919971:24000
Carbengle sandy clay loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, erodedCbE21231364262d71dtx08919971:24000
Carbengle sandy clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCbC301963656972sshmtx14919911:24000
Carbengle sandy clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesCbD90153656982v1v5tx14919911:24000
Carbengle-Gullied land complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesCbE41565365699d8jrtx14919911:24000
Carbengle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCbC50753664922sshktx17719971:24000
Carbengle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCbB30983664912ssgwtx17719971:24000
Carbengle loam, 5 to 12 percent slopesCbE2314366493d9cctx17719971:24000
Carbengle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCbC2923366354d96wtx17719971:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesCaC1837366747d9mktx18519881:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesCaD17923667482ssgxtx18519881:24000
Carbengle loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCaC341293690132sshktx28519861:24000
Carbengle loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedCaC311006369014dczptx28519861:24000
Carbengle loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesCaD8925369015dczqtx28519861:24000
Carbengle loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCaB37143690122ssgwtx28519861:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes20128533731472ssgxtx47719791:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes19127303731452ssgvtx47719791:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1836743731442tr6xtx47719791:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesCaD51313738222ssgxtx60019811:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesCaC25223738212ssgvtx60019811:24000
Carbengle clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesCaB5673738202tr6xtx60019811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CARBENGLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .