Soil Data Explorer - CAMPUS

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CAMPUS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CAMPUS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CAMPUS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
73	81P0656	S1981KS101001	Campus	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.46756,-100.3191

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CAMPUS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CAMPUS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CAMPUS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the CAMPUS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CAMPUS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the CAMPUS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CAMPUS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CAMPUS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. CO-2011-05-27-13 | Phillips County - 1971

   Cross section of Phillips County showing relationship of major soils to parent materials (Soil Survey of Phillips County, Colorado; 1971).

2. KS-2012-01-20-23 | Clark County - December 1982

   Typical pattern of soils in the Penden-Campus-Canlon association (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kansas; 1982).

3. KS-2012-01-23-52 | Lane County - November 1972

   Pattern of soils in association 2 (Soil Survey of Lane County, Kansas; 1972).

4. KS-2012-01-25-06 | Phillips County - September 1987

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Uly-Holdrege-Penden association (Soil Survey of Phillips County, Kansas; 1987).

5. NM-2012-02-14-02 | Harding County - November 1973

   Typical pattern of soils in association 8 in the north-central part of the county (Soil Survey of Harding County, New Mexico; November 1973).

Map Units

Map units containing CAMPUS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Wages-Campus-Weld loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes	WcC	7028	94790	35mr	co095	1971	1:20000
Wages-Campus-Weld loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	WcB	2003	94789	35mq	co095	1971	1:20000
Campus-Richfield loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes	CaC	4191	94925	35s3	co115	1969	1:15840
Campus-Richfield loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes	CaB	912	94924	35s2	co115	1969	1:15840
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	52237	1381701	2wsdg	ks025	1980	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	142	1150567	2twfl	ks039	1985	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	316	1380354	2twfl	ks047	1967	1:24000
Campus-Carlson complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes	2564	11309	1150109	2yjn7	ks051	1970	1:24000
Campus-Penden complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	2566	8773	1150110	2twfm	ks051	1970	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	1529	1150108	2twfl	ks051	1970	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	1040	1152304	2twfl	ks055	1962	1:24000
Canlon-Campus complex, 1 to 40 percent slopes	2570	35	1152305	2yjn8	ks055	1962	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	10221	1380414	2twfl	ks057	1962	1:24000
Penden and Campus soils, 3 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	2742	2715	1380448	2twdz	ks057	1962	1:24000
Campus clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	2554	2552	1380413	2yl4k	ks057	1962	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	3443	1150659	2twfl	ks063	1974	1:24000
Carlson-Campus complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes	2576	3311	1150661	2yjn9	ks063	1974	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	5562	1150789	2twfl	ks065	1985	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	595	1380562	2twfl	ks069	1965	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	1105	1151826	2twfl	ks071	1959	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	21553	1152401	2twfl	ks083	1966	1:24000
Penden-Campus clay loams, 1 to 4 percent slopes	2759	2809	1152422	2twf0	ks083	1966	1:24000
Penden and Campus soils, 3 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	2742	5	1152415	2twdz	ks083	1966	1:24000
Canlon-Campus complex, 1 to 40 percent slopes	2570	14786	1152011	2yjn8	ks101	1966	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	42	1453552	2twfl	ks101	1966	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	4176	1150507	2twfl	ks109	1962	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	50143	1381773	2wsdg	ks119	1973	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	9896	1152062	2twfl	ks135	1971	1:24000
Canlon-Campus complex, 1 to 40 percent slopes	2570	329	1152063	2yjn8	ks135	1971	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	10358	1150750	2twfl	ks137	1973	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	3442	1150899	2twfl	ks147	1985	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	27907	772973	2twfl	ks153	1979	1:24000
Campus-Anselmo complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	2560	7167	1150231	2yjn6	ks163	1980	1:24000
Campus loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	2558	1638	1150230	2yjn5	ks163	1980	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	13128	1151971	2twfl	ks171	1963	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	1811	1382644	2wsdg	ks175	1963	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	215	1149988	2twfl	ks179	1982	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	4558	1151107	2twfl	ks183	1974	1:24000
Campus clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	2554	1560	1382552	2yjnm	ks187	1959	1:24000
Campus clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	2556	242	1382553	1hdnh	ks187	1959	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	8974	1150836	2twfl	ks195	1986	1:24000
Campus-Carlson complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes	2564	69	1150837	2yjn7	ks195	1986	1:24000
Campus-Penden complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	2566	7	1150838	2twfm	ks195	1986	1:24000
Campus-Canlon complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	2562	11056	1151935	2twfl	ks203	1963	1:24000
Campus-Canyon complex, 11 to 30 percent slopes	2512	7808	1691942	2twfg	ne061	1974	1:20000
Canyon-Campus loams, 9 to 30 percent slopes	5156	1874	1691943	2yjnd	ne061	1974	1:20000
Campus-Canyon loams, 11 to 30 percent slopes	2511	2116	1699731	2yjn3	ne065	1975	1:20000
Campus-Dean association, gently sloping	CN	19606	376321	dmld	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, warm, 0 to 9 percent slopes	CDwD	18194	3156182	2xxw6	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	Cf	17109	376325	dmlj	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	Cb	17052	376323	dmlg	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus-Dean association, warm, 0 to 9 percent slopes	CNwD	11647	3156184	2xxwd	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus fine sandy loam	Ca	5757	376322	dmlf	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, eroded	Cc	4236	376324	dmlh	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 0 to 9 percent slopes	CD	3885	376319	dmlb	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus gravelly loam, 1 to 25 percent slopes	Cm	2034	376327	dmll	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, warm, 0 to 9 percent slopes, eroded	CEwD	1487	3156183	2xxw8	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes, eroded	Cg	1316	376326	dmlk	nm021	1968	1:31680
Campus loam, 0 to 9 percent slopes, eroded	CE	1033	376320	dmlc	nm021	1968	1:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CAMPUS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).