Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CAMBERT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CAMBERT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CAMBERT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
58A40A3731S1974MT055001CAMBERT6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.3991127,-105.5517807
58A40A3730S1974MT055004CAMBERT7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.3688354,-105.5559464

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CAMBERT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CAMBERT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CAMBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CAMBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CAMBERT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CAMBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CAMBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CAMBERT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CAMBERT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cambert-Cabba-Widen complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes733E42669343659cjlsmt01719951:24000
Cambert-Cherry-Cabba silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes734E25134343660cjltmt01719951:24000
Cherry-Cambert-Cabba silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes562D15729343541cjgzmt01719951:24000
Cambert-Widen complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes732D12957343658cjlrmt01719951:24000
Cherry-Cambert silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes561C6991343540cjgymt01719951:24000
Cambert-Widen complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes732C6097343657cjlqmt01719951:24000
Cambert-Cabba-Ringling complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes731E5694343656cjlpmt01719951:24000
Cambert-Bigsheep-Golva complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes962F23343806cjrjmt01719951:24000
Cherry-Cambert-Cabba silt loams, 4 to 15 percent slopes212D415814871861lxjrmt02119711:24000
Cherry-Cambert silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes211C380214871871lxjsmt02119711:24000
Cabba-Cambert complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes112D3685342067cgyfmt02519911:24000
Cambert-Cabba complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes112C1716342066cgydmt02519911:24000
Cambert loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes3789788344399ckcnmt05519811:24000
Cambert-Dast-Cabba complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes4053718344403ckcsmt05519811:24000
Bryant-Cambert complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1652912344360ckbdmt05519811:24000
Cambert-Cabba loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes3945999344401ckcqmt05519811:24000
Shambo-Cambert loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes12735591344324ck97mt05519811:24000
Macar-Cambert loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes11214415344308ck8qmt05519811:24000
Cambert-Barkof-Cabba complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes388979344400ckcpmt05519811:24000
Cherry-Cambert-Cabba silt loams, 4 to 15 percent slopes1845114570317g65mt05519811:24000
Wabek-Cambert, calcareous, complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes1305946344811cksymt07919861:24000
Cambert, calcareous-Cabba-Cherry, calcareous complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes224078344837cktsmt07919861:24000
Cherry-Cambert silt loams, calcareous, 2 to 8 percent slopes303025344864ckvnmt07919861:24000
Cambert, calcareous-Bigsheep-Golva complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes212948344836cktrmt07919861:24000
Subwell-Cambert, calcareous-Bigsheep, bedrock substratum, complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1172741344794cksdmt07919861:24000
Cabba-Cambert, calcareous-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 70 percent slopes192132344833cktnmt07919861:24000
Cherry, calcareous-Cambert, calcareous-Cabba silt loams, 4 to 15 percent slopes311984344869ckvtmt07919861:24000
Golva-Cambert silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes66764344985ckzkmt07919861:24000
Cambert, calcareous-Cabba-Dast complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes23542344839cktvmt07919861:24000
Cherry-Cambert silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes211C4083416775431t9m9mt08319731:24000
Cherry-Cambert-Cabba silt loams, 4 to 15 percent slopes212D2212622160432dcz8mt08319731:24000
Reeder-Cambert-Doney complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes5364279345571cllgmt10519761:24000
Reeder-Doney-Cambert complex, 9 to 35 percent slopes5454118345572cllhmt10519761:24000
Zahill-Cabba-Cambert complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes7454440348282cpdxmt66119821:24000
Cabba-Cambert-Cherry silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes1051703348212cpbnmt66119821:24000
Cabba-Cambert silt loams, 15 to 45 percent slopes931882348289cpf4mt66119821:24000
Cabba-Cambert-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1129719348213cpbpmt66119821:24000
Zahill-Cabba-Cambert complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes7319251348281cpdwmt66119821:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CAMBERT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .