Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BUTLER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BUTLER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BUTLER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
7583P06181983NE059006Butler5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.6077054,-97.4072263
7579P041679NE035001Butler7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.51,-98.0391667
7594P009893NE059001Butler7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.6394463,-97.7483368

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BUTLER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BUTLER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BUTLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BUTLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BUTLER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BUTLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BUTLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BUTLER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-25-19 | Republic County - November 1967

    Distribution of the soils in the Crete-Butler-Hastings association (Soil Survey of Republic County, Kansas; 1967).

  2. NE-2012-02-08-15 | Butler County - February 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Butler association and relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Butler County, Nebraska; February 1982).

  3. NE-2012-02-08-17 | Gage County - May 1964

    Schematic diagram showing the relationship of major soil series to parent materials in Gage County, Nebraska (Soil Survey of Gage County, Nebraska; May 1964).

  4. NE-2012-02-10-10 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Crete-Butler association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  5. NE-2012-02-10-11 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Crete-Hastings association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  6. NE-2012-02-10-12 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Massie association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  7. NE-2012-02-10-30 | Fillmore County - July 1986

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in the Hastings-Crete association (Soil Survey of Fillmore County, Nebraska; July 1986).

  8. NE-2012-02-10-31 | Fillmore County - July 1986

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in the Hastings-Uly-Geary and Muir-Hobbs-Butler associations (Soil Survey of Fillmore County, Nebraska; July 1986).

  9. NE-2012-02-10-32 | Fillmore County - July 1986

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in the Crete-Butler association (Soil Survey of Fillmore County, Nebraska; July 1986).

  10. NE-2012-02-13-19 | Hall County - January 1962

    Topography, soils, and parent materials, in the southeastern part of Hall County (Soil Survey of Hall County, Nebraska; January 1962).

  11. NE-2012-02-13-23 | Hamilton County - March 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and relationship to topography and parent material in the Hastings-Crete-Holder association (Soil Survey of Hamilton County, Nebraska; March 1985).

  12. NE-2012-02-13-35 | Kearney County - September 1984

    Typical pattern of soils in the Holdrege association (Soil Survey of Kearney County, Nebraska; September 1984).

  13. NE-2012-02-13-70 | Platte County - September 1988

    Typical landscape pattern of the soils and the underlying material in the Belfore-Moody association (Soil Survey of Platte County, Nebraska; September 1988).

  14. NE-2012-02-13-86 | Saunders County - January 1965

    Soils in the Sharpsburg-Fillmore association (Soil Survey of Saunders County, Nebraska; January 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing BUTLER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820289326058772qsjxks15719651:24000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820411426058782qsjxne00119701:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38201399726058792qsjxne02319791:20000
Olbut-Butler silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes3812433026058152qsk6ne02319791:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38202637526058802qsjxne03519791:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38204657626058812qsjxne05919841:20000
Olbut-Butler silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes3812667726058162qsk6ne05919841:20000
Butler silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3817179516923561tt14ne05919841:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820154026058822qsjxne06119741:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820166416910941trqfne06720001:12000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820546126058832qsjxne07920031:12000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820667826058842qsjxne08119821:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820140626058852qsjxne08319671:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820487326058862qsjxne09519701:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38201299026058872qsjxne09919821:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes382026711442232zp2kne10719891:20000
Butler silt loam, terrace, 0 to 1 percent slopes3713226716913451trzjne10919771:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820121216913441trzhne10919771:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820670526058882qsjxne12919741:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes382032416916101ts82ne13319691:15840
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820237826058892qsjxne13719671:20000
Butler silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38171002427548gbwwne13919701:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38202122171602zp2kne13919701:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes382011094276242zp2kne14119841:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820143126058902qsjxne14319671:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38201091426058912qsjxne15119851:20000
Butler silt loam, terrace, 0 to 1 percent slopes3713227116911401trrxne15119851:20000
Butler-Gayville silt loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes3818139516911421trrzne15119851:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38201261226058922qsjxne15919671:20000
Butler silt loam, terrace, 0 to 1 percent slopes3713844416911881trtgne15919671:20000
Butler-Olbut complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes381983316911971trtrne15919671:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820800126058932qsjxne16919651:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes3820169116998741v1vnne17519831:20000
Butler silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes38201535126058942qsjxne18519741:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BUTLER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .