Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BURKE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BURKE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BURKE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
892P0080S1991WA001008Burke8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.143055,-118.9097214

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BURKE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BURKE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BURKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BURKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BURKE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BURKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BURKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BURKE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-15 | Benton County Area - July 1971

    Cross section of Benton County, showing the relationship of elevation, precipitation, and major soil series (Soil Survey of Benton County Area, Washington; April 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing BURKE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Burke silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes88C256140921wyor64819771:24000
Burke silt loam, 1 to 7 percent slopes15B15005644542525or66719841:20000
Burke silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes15C3623644552526or66719841:20000
Burke silt loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes15E1985644562527or66719841:20000
Burke silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopesBUD140486813728wzwa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, erodedBUD259716813828x0wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesBUB39456813628wywa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesBuA35226814028x2wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, shallow, 0 to 5 percent slopesBvB32666814528x7wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesBuC5876814228x4wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 30 to 40 percent slopes, erodedBUE24896813928x1wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesBuE4846814428x6wa00119651:20000
Burke gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesBwB3876814828xbwa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesBuB2786814128x3wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesBuD2576814328x5wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, shallow, 15 to 30 percent slopesBvE1696814728x9wa00119651:20000
Burke silt loam, shallow, 5 to 10 percent slopesBvC1516814628x8wa00119651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes7475718462drmwa02119941:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes8187718722dsgwa02119941:20000
Burke silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes915719182dtywa02119941:20000
Burke silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes3213516880529ljwa02519791:24000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes319526880429lhwa02519791:24000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes2252376861729dgwa04319781:24000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesBmAB7235695162bbgwa60519651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, erodedBoD23399695262bbswa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesBmB1206695172bbhwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, shallow, 0 to 5 percent slopesBnB1172695212bbmwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, severely erodedBmE31063695192bbkwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesBmC784695182bbjwa60519651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedBoB2666695242bbqwa60519651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, erodedBoC2335695252bbrwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopesBmF324695202bblwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, shallow, 5 to 8 percent slopesBnC246695222bbnwa60519651:20000
Burke silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesBmA241695152bbfwa60519651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, erodedBoA2187695232bbpwa60519651:20000
Burke very fine sandy loam, shallow, 0 to 8 percent slopes, erodedBrC2179695272bbtwa60519651:20000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes5293256902129thwa67719791:24000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl silt loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes5378296902229tjwa67719791:24000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl very stony silt loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes5536666902429tlwa67719791:24000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes5434986902329tkwa67719791:24000
Burke silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes1216956890329ppwa67719791:24000
Burke silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes1014926888129nzwa67719791:24000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl silt loams, 5 to 8 percent slopes5111046902029tgwa67719791:24000
Burke silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes119566889229pbwa67719791:24000
Harwood-Burke-Wiehl silt loams, 2 to 5 percent slopes508176901929tfwa67719791:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BURKE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .