Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BUNKWATER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BUNKWATER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BUNKWATER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BUNKWATER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BUNKWATER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BUNKWATER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BUNKWATER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BUNKWATER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BUNKWATER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BUNKWATER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BUNKWATER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BUNKWATER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Bunkwater very fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes1210241496671jntnco68219861:24000
Breezy-Bunkwater-Hickerson complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesMbA1324217037641v5x4ut0131:24000
Breezy-Bunkwater-Hickerson complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesMbA174230813221v5x4ut04719991:24000
Bowbac-Shingle-like-Bunkwater complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes540633566712w7klwy04319761:24000
Bunkwater-Cielito-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes521233566672w7kcwy04319761:24000
Bunkwater loam, 10 to 30 percent slopes240933566652w7khwy04319761:24000
Winnett-like-Bunkwater-Forkwood complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes227033566642ynlswy04319761:24000
Hiland-Bunkwater-Vonalee complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes220433566602wxmqwy04319761:24000
Bunkwater-Remmit-Docpar, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1A0133566783014bwy04319761:24000
Hiland-Bunkwater-Vonalee complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes220431708752wxmqwy6031:24000
Bunkwater-Winnett-like-Olney complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes220631708772wxmxwy6031:24000
Bunkwater-Cielito-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes521231708792w7kcwy6031:24000
Winnett-like-Bunkwater-Forkwood complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes227033028822ynlswy6171:24000
Hiland-Bunkwater-Vonalee complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes220431970452wxmqwy6171:24000
Bunkwater-Cielito-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes521231708482w7kcwy6171:24000
Bowbac-Shingle-like-Bunkwater complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes540631708582w7klwy6171:24000
Bunkwater-Huntsman-like, occasionally flooded-Sage-like, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes1B02330284830141wy6171:24000
Bunkwater loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes2A01330285530148wy6171:24000
Bunkwater-Remmit-Docpar, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1A0133028573014bwy6171:24000
Remmit-Bunkwater complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes235732505022zv7qwy6291:24000
Hiland-Maysdorf-Bunkwater complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes223531332312ynlpwy6291:24000
Ulm-Winnett-Bunkwater complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes111931332402ynlzwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Hiland-like-Amodac-like complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes214131332632ynmqwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Vonalee complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes214231332682ynmwwy6291:24000
Hiland-Bunkwater-Vonalee complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes220429690972wxmqwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Keeline-Griver-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, frequently flooded120529118802w7hnwy6291:24000
Hiland-Romberg-like-Bunkwater complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes233332066672zc5swy6291:24000
Winnett-like-Bunkwater-Forkwood complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes227031332342ynlswy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Hiland-Winnett complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes212529119592y4yfwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Remmit-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, frequently flooded120429119562y4ybwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Clarkelen-Remmit-like complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes, frequently flooded110629119542y4y8wy6291:24000
Bowbac-Shingle-like-Bunkwater complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes540629119432w7klwy6291:24000
Bunkwater loam, 10 to 30 percent slopes240929119402w7khwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Cielito-like complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes521229119362w7kcwy6291:24000
Bunkwater-Winnett-like-Olney complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes220629691032wxmxwy6291:24000
Yarts-Bunkwater complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes1921287504060jxj0wy63819901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BUNKWATER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .