Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BREETON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BREETON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BREETON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BREETON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BREETON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BREETON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BREETON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BREETON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BREETON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BREETON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BREETON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BREETON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Bielenberg-Catgulch, very stony-Breeton complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes454E511515550556t9mt62219971:24000
Breeton coarse sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes362D156915542656qrmt62219971:24000
Breeton-Cometcrik complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1803C161215072151tzmt62719981:24000
Baxton-Connieo complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes1245E147315055551nmmt62719981:24000
Breeton coarse sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes1800D124615071851twmt62719981:24000
Clancy-Bielenberg-Breeton complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes1830E92215072851v6mt62719981:24000
Breeton-Baxton-Connieo complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes1802D81815072051tymt62719981:24000
Baxton, stony-Breeton, bouldery-Catgulch, very stony, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes1246E53515055651nnmt62719981:24000
Elmark, bouldery-Breeton-Shaboom, bouldery, complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1933E45115076751wgmt62719981:24000
Placerton-Farnuf-Breeton complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes1273E31115056951p2mt62719981:24000
Breeton gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes1182C28815053051mtmt62719981:24000
Sixteenmile-Breeton complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes371D69723928102l9xfmt6321:24000
Bielenberg-Catgulch, very stony-Breeton complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1731621465474xhbmt63619831:24000
Breeton coarse sandy loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes177121465394xh2mt63619831:24000
Sixteenmile-Krakon-Breeton complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes371D229513833681hfhsmt63720141:24000
Breeton sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes218D41014977050v9mt63920001:24000
Breeton sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes218C32314976950v8mt63920001:24000
Breeton loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes290C31314986150y7mt63920001:24000
Breeton loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes290C11824813552p91qmt6691:24000
Breeton-Macar complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes, very bouldery943932504332zv5nwy6291:24000
Breeton-Owenfort, rubbly surface-Burrfoot, rubbly surface, complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes570778525547262rc04wy6351:24000
Perma, extremely stony-Breeton fine sandy loams, 5 to 30 percent slopes98388515292181nb8mwy71920131:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BREETON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .