Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BRANTEL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BRANTEL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BRANTEL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
22A86P097686CA051003Brantel6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.9238167,-119.0181808
2686P081786CA051001Brantel7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.8922234,-119.0738907

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BRANTEL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BRANTEL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BRANTEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BRANTEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BRANTEL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BRANTEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BRANTEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BRANTEL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2010-08-30-11 | Benton-Owens Valley Area, Parts of Inyo and Mono Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils in the Adobe Valley area from the Adobe Hills southwest to the valley floor (Soil Survey of Benton-Owens Valley Area, California, Parts of Inyo and Mono Counties; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing BRANTEL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Brantel family, 0 to 15 percent slopes.13921883471370hthhca73219981:24000
Vitrandic Torriorthents, gravelly-Brantel family complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes.3178976471430htkfca73219981:24000
Brantel family-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes.1424657471372hthkca73219981:24000
Benemes-Brantel complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes128bo284122291112dtktca73219981:24000
Brantel family, 30 to 60 percent slopes.3102631471423htk6ca73219981:24000
Brantel-Poole families complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes.3822456471495htmjca73219981:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes134bo206622291142dtkxca73219981:24000
Brantel gravelly coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes132bo203622291132dtkwca73219981:24000
Lakash-Brantel families complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes.1461930471376hthpca73219981:24000
Yellowhills-Brantel families complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes.1631384471392htj6ca73219981:24000
Plutos family-Brantel association, 2 to 8 percent slopes284bo131122291652dtmkca73219981:24000
Montezuma-Brantel complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes265bo74822291622dtmgca73219981:24000
Alamedawell-Brantel association, 2 to 15 percent slopes102bo4662535446jcssca73219981:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, moist, 0 to 4 percent slopes136bo36822291162dtkzca73219981:24000
Buscones-Brantel-Sherwin association, 2 to 30 percent slopes141bo28222291202dtl3ca73219981:24000
Cashbaugh-Brantel association, 0 to 4 percent slopes158bo7722291272dtlbca73219981:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, low elevation, 0 to 5 percent slopes135bo2522291152dtkyca73219981:24000
Pizona-Brantel association, 2 to 50 percent slopes282bo724223840982l0vdca76319841:24000
Alamedawell gravelly substratum-Brantel association, 0 to 4 percent slopes103bo221423840852l0tzca76319841:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes134bo43623840892l0v3ca76319841:24000
Pizona-Brantel association, 2 to 50 percent slopes28223523488232jd1fca80219961:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes13422920488027jcttca80219961:24000
Alamedawell gravelly substratum-Brantel association, 0 to 4 percent slopes10315375487996jcstca80219961:24000
Brantel gravelly coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes13215375488025jctrca80219961:24000
Montezuma-Brantel complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes26514162488208jd0nca80219961:24000
Alamedawell-Brantel association, 2 to 15 percent slopes1025620487995jcssca80219961:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, moist, 0 to 4 percent slopes1365211488029jctwca80219961:24000
Brantel gravelly loamy sand, low elevation, 0 to 5 percent slopes1354822488028jctvca80219961:24000
Cashbaugh-Brantel association, 0 to 4 percent slopes1583071488051jcvlca80219961:24000
Brantel gravelly coarse sand, cool, 2 to 8 percent slopes1332854488026jctsca80219961:24000
Plutos family-Brantel association, 2 to 8 percent slopes2842702488234jd1hca80219961:24000
Buscones-Brantel-Pizona association, 2 to 30 percent slopes1402118488033jcv0ca80219961:24000
Benemes-Brantel complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes1281329488021jctmca80219961:24000
Montezuma-Brantel complex, dry, 2 to 9 percent slopes2661227488210jd0qca80219961:24000
Buscones-Brantel-Sherwin association, 2 to 30 percent slopes1411180488034jcv1ca80219961:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BRANTEL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .