Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BRACEVILLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BRACEVILLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BRACEVILLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/aAB-1021960-OH007-102Braceville2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aAB-1031960-OH007-103Braceville2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BRACEVILLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BRACEVILLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BRACEVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BRACEVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BRACEVILLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BRACEVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BRACEVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BRACEVILLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. PA-2012-03-12-25 | Bradford and Sullivan Counties - August 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Alton-Pope-Chenango map unit (Soil Survey of Bradford and Sullivan Counties, PA; 1986).

  2. PA-2012-03-13-55 | Luzerne County - October 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in association 4 (Soil Survey of Luzerne County, PA; 1981).

  3. PA-2012-03-13-64 | Mercer County - April 1971

    Relationship of soils and underlying material in associations 2 and 3 (Soil Survey of Mercer County, PA; 1971).

  4. PA-2012-03-13-70 | Monroe County - August 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Wyoming-Chenango-Pope map unit (Soil Survey of Monroe County, PA; 1981).

Map Units

Map units containing BRACEVILLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrsA261298581b0pnnj03119721:24000
Braceville gravelly silt loamBr2562891669pwyny00719661:15840
Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrA38172947909wrcny10119721:15840
Braceville gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB2242947919wrdny10119721:15840
Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesBvA1392955879xl2ny10919631:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBcB21616508781sdw4oh15519861:15840
Braceville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBcB5672900233l6jzpa00719781:15840
Braceville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBcC1782900234l6k0pa00719781:15840
Braceville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBeB1853538145l1zjpa01919841:15840
Braceville loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBeA419538144l1zhpa01919841:15840
Braceville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBeC348538146l1zkpa01919841:15840
Braceville loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrA840539455l3bspa03719651:20000
Braceville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB287539456l3btpa03719651:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB75732961589y5hpa03919731:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrA13862961579y5gpa03919731:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesBcB133299284b1fbpa06919761:20000
Braceville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBcB22562900385l6jzpa07319781:15840
Braceville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBcC10772900386l6k0pa07319781:15840
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB34082964179yfvpa07919741:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBrC13992964189yfwpa07919741:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrA4042964169yftpa07919741:20000
Braceville silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBeB1520539885l3snpa08319841:20000
Braceville silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBvB292682962149y79pa08519671:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBrB231132962119y76pa08519671:20000
Braceville silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedBvC213362962159y7bpa08519671:20000
Braceville silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBvA11762962139y78pa08519671:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedBrC26162962129y77pa08519671:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBrB14132962819y9gpa08919751:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesBrA13312962809y9fpa08919751:20000
Braceville fine sandy loam141962971909z7spa10319951:24000
Braceville gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBvB15152971029z4ypa11719731:20000
Braceville gravelly loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesBcB761301912b453pa13119761:20000
Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesBcB5675539210l32wpa60919791:20000
Braceville silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesBaB20992967489ysjpa61019781:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BRACEVILLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .