Soil Data Explorer - BOULDERJUD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BOULDERJUD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BOULDERJUD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BOULDERJUD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
43A	07N0030	S06ID055005	Boulderjud	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	47.8561516,-117.0354767
43A	01P0254	S2000WA063005	Boulderjud	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	47.877594,-117.1047516
43A	05N0161	S2004ID057008	Boulderjud	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	46.8049736,-116.8536682

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BOULDERJUD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BOULDERJUD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOULDERJUD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOULDERJUD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BOULDERJUD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOULDERJUD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOULDERJUD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BOULDERJUD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BOULDERJUD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5103	20	2662948	2wdp	id604	1981	1:24000
Kellerbutte-Boulderjud complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5120	20	2662947	2wcf	id604	1981	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, dry, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5105	314	2662903	2wcz	id606	1976	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5103	287	2662901	2wdp	id606	1976	1:24000
Kellerbutte-Boulderjud complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5120	117	2662909	2wcf	id606	1976	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, dry, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5104	97	2662902	2wcy	id606	1976	1:24000
Kellerbutte-Boulderjud, dry, complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5123	67	2662912	nvdr	id606	1976	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5103	10201	85922	2wdp	wa063	2012	1:24000
Kellerbutte-Boulderjud, dry, complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5123	3054	621201	nvdr	wa063	2012	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5102	2897	85919	2wdl	wa063	2012	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, dry, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5105	1902	85900	2wcz	wa063	2012	1:24000
Kellerbutte-Boulderjud complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5120	1185	85883	2wcf	wa063	2012	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, dry, 15 to 30 percent slopes	5104	1180	85899	2wcy	wa063	2012	1:24000
Boulderjud ashy silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes	5103	27	2651252	2wdp	wa651	1981	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BOULDERJUD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).