Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BOSLER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BOSLER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BOSLER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
34A82P068182WY013007Bosler6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.4969444,-107.8372192
34A83P063683WY025011Bosler7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5233345,-106.8330536
34A98P0452S1998WY013005BOSLER7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.1701667,-109.0190278

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BOSLER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BOSLER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOSLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOSLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BOSLER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOSLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOSLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BOSLER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BOSLER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Bosler sandy loamBs22880497764jpyxco64619731:24000
Bosler sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesBsB4011498189jqdmco66219681:24000
Bosler-Borollic Camborthids complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes12024814501648jv06wy60119911:24000
Bosler fine sandy loam, wet substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopes11910187501646jv04wy60119911:24000
Bosler, wet substratum-Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes121265501650jv08wy60119911:24000
Bosler-Alcova complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes13023818502208jvl8wy62519851:24000
Edlin-Rock River-Bosler complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes17613855502264jvn2wy62519851:24000
Bosler-Hiland association, rolling1314372502209jvl9wy62519851:24000
Milren-Bosler-Rock River sandy loams, 1 to 12 percent slopes2214271502333jvq9wy62519851:24000
Rawlins-Bosler complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes -- draft329AB693623849842l1rzwy6301:24000
Rawlins-Bosler complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes -- draft329CE540923785542kv2kwy6301:24000
Bosler-Hooper complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes51963502913jwb0wy63619861:15840
Bosler sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slope50407502912jw9zwy63619861:15840
Bosler-Rock River sandy loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes0042526115741958t1wy6471:24000
Bosler-Rock River complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes500809615277041n8pswy6471:24000
Bosler-Ryan Park fine sandy loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes13512281576125908wy6471:24000
Bosler-Rock River sandy loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes120106782502985jwdbwy71319861:24000
Milren-Bosler-Rock River sandy loams, 1 to 12 percent slopes17462517503039jwg2wy71319861:24000
Cragosen-Bosler-Cushool association, rolling13847095503003jwdxwy71319861:24000
Bosler-Ryan Park fine sandy loams, 1 to 8 percent slopes12140063502986jwdcwy71319861:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BOSLER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .