Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BORVANT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BORVANT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BORVANT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
4770C0025S1970UT039001Borvant8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1338501,-111.9888306
4770C0026S1970UT039006Borvant7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.8144455,-111.5041656

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BORVANT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BORVANT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BORVANT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BORVANT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BORVANT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BORVANT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BORVANT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BORVANT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. UT-2010-11-05-04 | Tooele County Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Borvant-Abela-Kapod general soil map unit (adjacent to the Lodar-Reywat-Lundy general soil map unit) (Soil Survey of Tooele County Area, Utah; 2000).

  2. UT-2012-03-22-15 | Tooele Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Borvant-Abela-Kapod general soil map units (adjacent to the Lodar-Reywat-Lundy general soil map unit). (Soil Survey of Tooele Area, Utah; Tooele County and Parts of Box Elder, Davis, and Juab Counties, Utah, and Parts of White Pine and Elko Counties, Nevada; 2000).

  3. UT-2012-03-22-17 | Tooele Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lodar-Reywat-Lundy and Dateman-Podmor-Rock outcrop general soil map units (adjacent to the Borvant-Abela-Kapod general soil map unit). (Soil Survey of Tooele Area, Utah; Tooele County and Parts of Box Elder, Davis, and Juab Counties, Utah, and Parts of White Pine and Elko Counties, Nevada; 2000).

Map Units

Map units containing BORVANT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Borvant extremely gravelly loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes190056524061082lrrdnv70820091:24000
Borvant extremely gravelly loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes1900105624061532lrsvnv70920121:24000
Borvant extremely gravelly loam, 4 to 30 percent slopes19002795780499v65dnv77920041:24000
Urmafot-Borvant-Biken association2919438480405j3wynv78019901:24000
Fontreen-Borvant gravelly loams, 5 to 20 percent slopes3110317481239j4rvut60119851:24000
Borvant gravelly loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes103216481216j4r3ut60119851:24000
Borvant cobbly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes80023388729813642tjslut60819811:24000
Borvant cobbly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesBgC32180482464j61cut60819811:24000
Fontreen-Borvant complex, 2 to 25 percent slopesFfD7076482501j62kut60819811:24000
Borvant-Reywat complex, 8 to 30 percent slopesBhD6764482466j61fut60819811:24000
Borvant-Reywat complex, 30 to 60 percent slopesBhF5129482467j61gut60819811:24000
Borvant-Sandall complex, 8 to 60 percent slopesBkE2597482468j61hut60819811:24000
Deer Creek-Borvant complex, 2 to 25 percent slopesDcD1991482483j61zut60819811:24000
Borvant gravelly loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes763997482180j5r6ut61119921:24000
Borvant-Pavant complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2221690481813j5ccut61819951:24000
Donnardo-Borvant-Collard complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes386107481830j5cxut61819951:24000
Borvant very gravelly loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes193998481809j5c7ut61819951:24000
Borvant-Jardal complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes212570481812j5cbut61819951:24000
Borvant-Jardal complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes201832481811j5c9ut61819951:24000
Borvant-Lodar complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes, erodedBUD215625482225j5snut62719711:24000
Borvant-Doyce complex, 2 to 10 percent slopesBTC7320482224j5smut62719711:24000
Borvant-Bagard complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes, erodedBSE25830482223j5slut62719711:24000
Borvant cobbly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, erodedBRD25810482222j5skut62719711:24000
Fontreen-Borvant complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes, erodedFSD24655482260j5tsut62719711:24000
Ant Flat-Borvant complex, 4 to 25 percent slopesALD1080482200j5rvut62719711:24000
Borvant-Tombar association, 2 to 15 percent slopes1143401483568j75zut6281:24000
Borvant very stony loam, dry, 4 to 30 percent slopes11375424263652mftvut6281:24000
Borvant family, 8 to 25 percent slopes116581644mj7qut6491:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BORVANT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .