Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BOOTHBAY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BOOTHBAY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BOOTHBAY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/a91P0054S90ME019008Boothbay6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BOOTHBAY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BOOTHBAY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOOTHBAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOOTHBAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BOOTHBAY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BOOTHBAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BOOTHBAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BOOTHBAY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ME-2010-09-03-07 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Swanville-Boothbay-Nicholville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  2. ME-2010-09-03-08 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Charles-Medomak-Cornish general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  3. ME-2012-02-03-02 | Knox and Lincoln Counties - January 1987

    The typical pattern of the soils on the landscape and the underlying material and bedrock in the Buxton-Scantic-Lyman map unit (Soil Survey of Knox and Lincoln Counties, Maine; January 1987).

  4. ME-2012-02-03-03 | Knox and Lincoln Counties - January 1987

    The typical pattern of the soils on the landscape and the underlying material and bedrock in the Boothbay-Swanville-Lyman map unit (Soil Survey of Knox and Lincoln Counties, Maine; January 1987).

  5. ME-2012-02-03-04 | Knox and Lincoln Counties - January 1987

    The typical pattern of the soils on the landscape and the underlying material and bedrock in the Peru-Swanville-Lyman map unit (Soil Survey of Knox and Lincoln Counties, Maine; January 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing BOOTHBAY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Boothbay silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBoB212932845269k28me02719791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBoC110562845279k29me02719791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesBoD34632845289k2bme02719791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, severely erodedBoE315592845299k2cme02719791:20000
Boothbay very stony silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBpB9062845309k2dme02719791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBoB252752846859k7dme60119831:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBoC141692846869k7fme60119831:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedBoD212142846879k7gme60119831:20000
Swanville-Boothbay association, gently slopingSYB51182850579kmdme61019921:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBoB10082849729kjnme61019921:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBoC5452849739kjpme61019921:20000
Pushaw-Boothbay complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesPbB6955740621svp0me61220161:24000
Boothbay silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBoC2427740622svp1me61220161:24000
Boothbay-Pushaw-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesBuB115627524352synrme61220161:24000
Boothbay silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesBoD950740623svp2me61220161:24000
Pushaw-Boothbay complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesPYB90327524372syntme61220161:24000
Boothbay silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopesBoE291740624svp3me61220161:24000
Boothbay-Swanville association, gently slopingBOB123222853049kwcme61519941:24000
Boothbay silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBhB14642853079kwgme61519941:24000
Boothbay silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBuC27852818959gbdvt01519791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesBuB21692818949gbcvt01519791:20000
Boothbay silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesBuD8982818969gbfvt01519791:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BOOTHBAY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .