Soil Data Explorer - BONNELL

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BONNELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BONNELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BONNELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
114B	BA7003	1970IN005003	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.0802028,-86.0591139
114B	JF7706	1977IN077006	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.6857139,-85.5866694
114B	FR8106	1981IN047006	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.4215472,-85.1667722
114B	SW8101	1981IN155001	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.8282861,-85.1746139
114B	87P0005	86IN143004	Bonnell	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.7766685,-85.7350006
120C	JN8010	1980IN071010	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.0080139,-86.0669111
120C	BR8107	1981IN013007	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.0764778,-86.1060556
121	OH7401	1974IN115001	Bonnell	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.9189528,-85.0694722
121	RI7909	1979IN137009	Bonnell	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.984375,-85.1707611
n/a	HA-003	1977-OH061-003	Bonnell	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BONNELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BONNELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the BONNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the BONNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BONNELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the BONNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the BONNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BONNELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IN-2010-09-24-22 | Scott County -

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Nabb-Cincinnati-Blocher association (Soil Survey of Scott County, Indiana).

2. OH-2012-02-16-16 | Brown County - July 1992

   Typical pattern of soils in the Rossmoyne-Bonnell association (Soil Survey of Brown County, Ohio; July 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing BONNELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Blocher-Bonnell silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BlhD2	6047	243889	85sd	in005	2002	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory-Blocher complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnuD3	2591	243904	85sw	in005	2002	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory clay loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, gullied	BobE5	69	246453	88g3	in005	2002	1:12000
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	BnD2	965	535584	kz9x	in013	1985	1:15840
Bonnell clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes, gullied	BpD3	59	535585	kz9y	in013	1985	1:15840
Blocher-Bonnell silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BlhD2	6	1651375	1sfd5	in013	1985	1:15840
Hickory-Bonnell complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes	HerE	1342	185196	66q2	in019	2001	1:12000
Bonnell clay loam, 12 to 22 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnyD3	843	200933	2w57h	in019	2001	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory clay loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, gullied	BobE5	18	200934	6r2r	in019	2001	1:12000
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded	BeD3	5676	1600637	1qqlg	in029	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	BeD2	4003	1600636	2w565	in029	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes	BeE	2892	1600638	1qqlh	in029	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BeC2	1014	1600634	1qqlc	in029	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	BeC3	243	1600635	1qqld	in029	1979	1:15840
Bonnell clay loam, 12 to 22 percent slopes, severely eroded	BpD3	11346	162263	2w57h	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BoE2	9847	162262	5fv8	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	BoD2	8938	162261	2w565	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes	BnF	4047	162259	5fv5	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BoC2	1893	162260	5fv6	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	BrC3	794	162264	5fvb	in047	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	BnwD2	1620	1906759	2w565	in071	1985	1:15840
Bonnell silty clay loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded	BocD3	853	1906760	2204d	in071	1985	1:15840
Blocher-Bonnell silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BlhD2	60	620314	nth4	in071	1985	1:15840
Bonnell-Hickory-Blocher complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnuD3	39	620315	nth5	in071	1985	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BnC2	1379	964626	11crz	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 18 to 45 percent slopes	BnE	1254	964630	11cs3	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	BnD2	872	964628	2w565	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnD3	743	964629	11cs2	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnC3	207	964627	11cs0	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell-Hickory clay loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, gullied	BpE5	35	968663	11hz6	in077	1982	1:15840
Bonnell-Blocher-Hickory silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BlkE2	14276	721377	s6n7	in079	2010	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory-Blocher complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnuD3	3070	1861449	20gzr	in079	2010	1:12000
Bonnell-Grayford silt loams, karst, hilly, eroded	BnxE2	610	1861470	20h0f	in079	2010	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory clay loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very severely eroded	BobE4	104	709139	rsxg	in079	2010	1:12000
Bonnell-Grayford silt loams, karst, hilly, severely eroded	BnxE3	51	2427927	2mhg7	in079	2010	1:12000
Bonnell silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes	BeE	1332	1600530	1qqh0	in115	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded	BeD3	685	1600529	1qqgz	in115	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	BeD2	310	1600528	2w565	in115	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BeC2	93	1600526	1qqgw	in115	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	BeC3	10	1600527	1qqgx	in115	1979	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes	BeE	908	1479620	1lnnp	in137	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded	BeD3	781	1479619	1lnnn	in137	1982	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BeC2	389	1479618	1lnnm	in137	1982	1:15840
Hickory-Bonnell complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes	HerE	4638	165689	5kdt	in143	1995	1:12000
Bonnell clay loam, 12 to 22 percent slopes, severely eroded	BnyD3	1353	165600	2w57h	in143	1995	1:12000
Bonnell-Hickory clay loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, gullied	BobE5	378	165603	5kb1	in143	1995	1:12000
Bonnell silty clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BoE2	4873	535265	kyzm	in155	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silty clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	BoC2	1963	535264	kyzl	in155	1984	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BoD2	16361	169709	5plh	oh015	1987	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes	BoE	4765	169710	5plj	oh015	1987	1:15840
Rossmoyne-Bonnell complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	RwC3	2645	169734	5pm9	oh015	1987	1:15840
Bonnell silty clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	BrD3	1969	169712	5pll	oh015	1987	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 40 to 60 percent slopes	BoF	720	169711	5plk	oh015	1987	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes	BoE	253	2440335	2mxch	oh025	1972	1:20000
Bonnell silty clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	BrD3	83	2440337	2mxck	oh025	1972	1:20000
Bonnell silt loam, 40 to 60 percent slopes	BoF	67	2440336	2mxcj	oh025	1972	1:20000
Rossmoyne-Bonnell complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely eroded	RwC3	38	2440346	2mxcv	oh025	1972	1:20000
Bonnell silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BoD2	37	2440334	2mxcg	oh025	1972	1:20000
Bonnell silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes	BoE	2687	169373	5p7n	oh061	1980	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	BoD	1455	169372	5p7m	oh061	1980	1:15840
Urban land-Alfic Udarents-Bonnell complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes	UABXD	403	2652869	2pyym	oh061	1980	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	BoF	278	169374	5p7p	oh061	1980	1:15840
Urban land-Alfic Udarents-Bonnell complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes	UABXF	164	2652870	2pyyc	oh061	1980	1:15840
Bonnell-Urban land complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes	BoUD	76	3404798	31gfq	oh061	1980	1:15840
Bonnell-Urban land complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes	BoUE	47	3404799	31gfr	oh061	1980	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	BaD2	47	1420547	1jp63	oh071	1973	1:15840
Bonnell silty clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	BbD3	10	1420549	1jp65	oh071	1973	1:15840
Bonnell silt loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes	BaE	5	1420548	1jp64	oh071	1973	1:15840
Bonnell-Urban land complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes	BoUE	56	3422225	31gfr	oh165	1967	1:20000
Bonnell silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes	BoE	33	1700919	1v2yc	oh165	1967	1:20000
Bonnell silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	BoD	6	1700918	1v2yb	oh165	1967	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BONNELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).