Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BIGNELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BIGNELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BIGNELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BIGNELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BIGNELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BIGNELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BIGNELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BIGNELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes699E529955394wsbmt60319891:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes699F329955404wscmt60319891:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes99E5215521156htmt61620031:24000
Bignell, dry-Yreka, cool complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes299E47651443194v5gmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes399E36421443784v7cmt62119971:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes983E24821446654vjmmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes499E16031444614vb1mt62119971:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes983D12211446644vjlmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka gravelly loams, 35 to 60 percent slopes299F10771443204v5hmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes399F7741443794v7dmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes799E7131445854vg1mt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka gravelly loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes399D5541443774v7bmt62119971:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes99E4481446814vk4mt62119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes199E3151442684v3tmt62119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes199D3061442674v3smt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes499D2471444604vb0mt62119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, dry, 35 to 60 percent slopes99F2311446824vk5mt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes799D1891445844vg0mt62119971:24000
Bignell, dry-Yreka, cool complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes299D771443184v5fmt62119971:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes499F511444624vb2mt62119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes199F201442694v3vmt62119971:24000
Bignell, stony-Yreka, very stony, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes1970E6915078651x2mt62719981:24000
Mocmont-Bignell-Tolex very stony loams, 25 to 60 percent slopes27F99761477694yrrmt63019911:24000
Bignell very stony loam, 8 to 35 percent slopes215E11821477404yqtmt63019911:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes299F70617032461v5cfmt63520061:24000
Bignell, dry-Yreka, cool, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes299E54117032451v5cdmt63520061:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes399F42917029471v51smt63520061:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes983E37017030151v53zmt63520061:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes399E28217029461v51rmt63520061:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes983D27717030141v53ymt63520061:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes499E20117029661v52dmt63520061:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes199Eg19717031211v57dmt63520061:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes399D18117029451v51qmt63520061:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes99E14717032301v5bxmt63520061:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes199F13017032441v5ccmt63520061:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes199E11717032431v5cbmt63520061:24000
Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes799E10917030111v53vmt63520061:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes23203641454394wblmt63819851:24000
Bignell, warm-Winkler complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes2538471454414wbnmt63819851:24000
Bignell-Winkler, cool, complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes2428921454404wbmmt63819851:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes299E114051456524wkgmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes399E78291457194wmmmt64419951:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes983E74451459764wwxmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes299F63901456534wkhmt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes99E52571459954wxjmt64419951:24000
Bignell, cool-Yreka complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes499E49011457784wpjmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes399F46601457204wmnmt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes99D37911459944wxhmt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes199E33901455954whmmt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes699D33491458644ws9mt64419951:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes983D31691459754wwwmt64419951:24000
Bignell, cool-Yreka complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes499F29381457794wpkmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes799E25041458944wt8mt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes699E14961458654wsbmt64419951:24000
Bignell, cool-Yreka complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes499D7011457774wphmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Rumblecreek complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes999E6571459914wxdmt64419951:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, moist, 8 to 25 percent slopes883E6371459454wvxmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes799D4941458934wt7mt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes199F4771455974whpmt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly clay loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes99F4241459964wxkmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Rumblecreek complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes999D2451459904wxcmt64419951:24000
Crow-Bignell complex, moist, 25 to 50 percent slopes883F2311459464wvymt64419951:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes699F1701458664wscmt64419951:24000
Bignell-Rumblecreek complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes999F421459924wxfmt64419951:24000
Trapps-Bignell families, complex, steep mountain slopes30B32880754412tb0wmt64520131:12000
Trapps-Bignell families, complex, steep mountain slopes30B32456515022851b2mt64720071:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes82D168815633857p5mt65119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes82B100215633657p3mt65119971:24000
Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes82E18715634057p7mt65119971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BIGNELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .