Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BIGCOW soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BIGCOW, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BIGCOW were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BIGCOW soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BIGCOW series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGCOW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGCOW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BIGCOW share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGCOW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGCOW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BIGCOW, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing BIGCOW as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
McWillis-Bigcow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4110BO2331203061qxwkor60720181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, dry, 15 to 30 percent slopes4225BO2596833853822r5m8or62620181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, dry, 0 to 15 percent slopes4225AO1995133853812r5m7or62620181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder-Limberjim complex, dry, 15 to 30 percent slopes4220BO1623233852842r5m5or62620181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4112CO1072831222751r0dxor62620181:24000
Bennettcreek-Bigcow-Linecreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4178CO543931221511qxwvor62620181:24000
Wonder-Bigcow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4177BO436631221561qy0jor62620181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder-Limberjim complex, dry, 0 to 15 percent slopes4220AO410433853772r5m4or62620181:24000
McWillis-Bigcow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4110BO119831221461qxwkor62620181:24000
McWillis-Olot-Bigcow complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4181CO117931222891r0z0or62620181:24000
Bigcow-Limberjim-Gerow complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4227AW70133853832tz1kor62620181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4112CO43934318651r0dxor6271:24000
Wonder-Bigcow-Larabee complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4156CO446824372041qy0qor63120181:24000
McWillis-Bigcow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4110BO435224868081qxwkor63120181:24000
Bigcow-McWillis complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4111CO409624868091qy05or63120181:24000
McWillis-Bigcow-Cherrycreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes5873BO51224373901sj3mor63120181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4112BO32524868101qd00or63120181:24000
Bigcow-Wonder complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4112CO3324868111r0dxor63120181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BIGCOW soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .