Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BIGBEND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BIGBEND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BIGBEND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
63B83P056282SD085014Bigbend7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.7141685,-99.7766647
7290P017689NE057100Bigbend7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.0924988,-101.4499969

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BIGBEND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BIGBEND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGBEND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGBEND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BIGBEND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BIGBEND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BIGBEND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BIGBEND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2010-09-28-01 | Dundy County -

    Typical pattern of soil and underlying material in the Sanborn-Haigler-Calamus and Bigbend-Munjor-McCook associations (Soil Survey of Dundy County, Nebraska).

  2. SD-2012-03-15-59 | Jones County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bigbend-Hilmoe and Sansarc-Opal associations (Soil Survey of Jones County, SD; 1999).

  3. SD-2012-03-15-71 | Lyman County - May 1987

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Sansarc-Opal and Munjor-Hilmoe-Bigbend associations (Soil Survey of Lyman County, SD; 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing BIGBEND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
McCook and Bigbend loams2305592316994632zwkjne14519651:20000
Bigbend silt loamBb29333536172tj7ysd07519911:24000
Bigbend silt loam, floodedBf2213353618cvz1sd07519911:24000
Bigbend very fine sandy loamBh948353620cvz3sd07519911:24000
Bigbend silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedBgA7633536192zzvwsd07519911:24000
Bigbend-Inavale complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedBi4193536212zk3zsd07519911:24000
Bigbend silt loamBg23933555622tj7ysd08519841:20000
Bigbend silt loamMn58823534012tj7ysd09519711:20000
Bigbend silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedBgA29173533462zzvwsd09519711:20000
Bigbend silt loamHa38003543942tj7ysd12319751:20000
Bigbend-Inavale complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedBi16443543712zk3zsd12319751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BIGBEND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .