Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BADGER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BADGER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BADGER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
102A90P023789SD025007Badger7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.6138878,-97.6341629
102A90P024589SD077025Badger5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.3972206,-97.3083344
102A90P024689SD077026Badger5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.4916649,-97.4791641
102A90P024789SD077027Badger5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.4580574,-97.2083359
102A89P0058S87SD077-016Badger8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.4550018,-97.2083359
55C90P023889SD025009Badger7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.5699997,-97.6855545

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BADGER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BADGER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BADGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BADGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BADGER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BADGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BADGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BADGER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2010-11-01-01 | Brookings County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Poinsett-Buse-Waubay association (Soil Survey of Brookings County, South Dakota; 2004).

  2. SD-2010-11-01-02 | Brookings County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kranzburg-Brookings association (Soil Survey of Brookings County, South Dakota; 2004).

  3. SD-2010-11-01-03 | Brookings County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Barnes association (Soil Survey of Brookings County, South Dakota; 2004).

  4. SD-2010-11-01-08 | Hamlin County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Poinsett-Waubay-Buse association (Soil Survey of Hamlin County, South Dakota; 2003).

  5. SD-2012-03-14-16 | Clark County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Poinsett-Waubay-Buse association (Soil Survey of Clark County, SD; 1999).

  6. SD-2012-03-15-62 | Kingsbury County - November 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Poinsett-Waubay-Buse association (Soil Survey of Kingsbury County, SD; 1997).

Map Units

Map units containing BADGER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hidewood-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesJ93A3942991430128nmmn08120071:12000
Hidewood-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesJ93A28839888851260jmn10120081:12000
Hidewood-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesJ93A26869780042v5pnmn11720051:12000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesMt100374187842wkrdsd01119951:24000
Badger silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesBa63184187182wkr7sd01119951:24000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesCo60444187382wkr9sd01119951:24000
Hamerly-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHb57184187632wkrgsd01119951:24000
Hamerly-Cavour-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHc416418764g1rjsd01119951:24000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesCv36744177112wkr9sd02519921:20000
Badger-Tonka silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 1 percent slopesBa16704176822wkr8sd02519921:20000
Badger-Tonka silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopesG201A72327980052sd1xsd02519921:20000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesG786A5427980282sd5msd02519921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ117A643627130072wkrdsd02920061:12000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesJ123A249016837922wkr9sd02920061:12000
Waubay-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJ192A158816842912wkrcsd02920061:12000
Hamerly-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ115A141127130052wkrgsd02920061:12000
Badger-Tonka silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 1 percent slopesZ102A71927129962wkr8sd02920061:12000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesCw5844170592wkr9sd03719921:20000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesG786A20927985242sd5msd03719921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ117A1127654012wkrdsd03719921:20000
Hamerly-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHm105624168642wkrgsd03919921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesMk67464168772wkrdsd03919921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ117A147527128632wkrdsd05119771:20000
Hamerly-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ115A60427128612wkrgsd05119771:20000
Badger-Tonka silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 1 percent slopesZ102A3327128522wkr8sd05119771:20000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesCu173414172682wkr9sd05719921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesMc10724172932wkrdsd05719921:20000
Badger silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesBa3594172432wkr7sd05719921:20000
Badger silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesBa81624174492wkr7sd07719921:20000
Cubden-Badger silty clay loams, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopesCv76974174692wkr9sd07719921:20000
Waubay-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesWb64104175232wkrcsd07719921:20000
Mckranz-Badger silty clay loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ117A29527127772wkrdsd10919771:20000
Hamerly-Badger complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesZ115A16627127752wkrgsd10919771:20000
Ow plateau-Badger families, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded911073815244wcb6ut6511:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BADGER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .