Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ATHERTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ATHERTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ATHERTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
111BAL-s091957-OH003-S09Atherton3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.8768463,-84.018837

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ATHERTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ATHERTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ATHERTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ATHERTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ATHERTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ATHERTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ATHERTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ATHERTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-14 | Otsego County - 2006

    Relationships between landscape and parent material for selected soils in Otsego County (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

  2. OH-2012-02-16-11 | Ashtabula County - May 1973

    Soil pattern in the Elnora-Colonie-Kingsville soil association (Soil Survey of Ashtabula County, Ohio; May 1973).

  3. PA-2012-03-13-47 | Lackawanna and Wyoming Counties - March 1982

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Wyoming-Pope association (Soil Survey of Lackawanna and Wyoming Counties, PA; 1982).

  4. PA-2012-03-13-55 | Luzerne County - October 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in association 4 (Soil Survey of Luzerne County, PA; 1981).

Map Units

Map units containing ATHERTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesRaA5348301872b43tme60719601:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopesRaB3046301873b43vme60719601:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopesRaB2270614206nm43me60819621:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesRaA968614205nm42me60819621:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesRaB168332852559ktsme61419601:20000
Red Hook and Atherton fine sandy loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesRdB112732852569kttme61419601:20000
Atherton mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesAtcA46612732nklknj03720021:24000
Atherton mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesAtcA16114747017j15nj04120071:12000
Atherton silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes34A1892185997920fgbny00320131:24000
Atherton mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes39A566185998320fggny00320131:24000
Atherton mucky silt loamAt2872899099qnxny01519691:20000
Atherton silt loamAt21252899689qqtny01719821:15840
Atherton silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesGfA19912677679bmk8ny04920181:24000
Atherton silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesWfA13062677811bmpgny04920181:24000
Atherton silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesGgA2212677680bmk9ny04920181:24000
Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes20A24324542382nctzny06920121:12000
Atherton silt loamAt19682941769w3kny07719931:24000
Atherton silt loamAt8702947859wr6ny10119721:15840
Atherton silt loamAl2502957999xsxny10719471:31680
Lyons-Atherton complex, very stonyLY58162954989xh6ny11119741:15840
Atherton silt loamAt37062954489xflny11119741:15840
Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 percent slopes20A29832648702nctzny12319481:12000
Atherton loamAt627539446l3bhpa03719651:20000
Atherton loam, pondedAt242299278b1f4pa06919761:20000
Atherton silt loam, gray subsoil variantAt8382964099yflpa07919741:20000
Atherton silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesAhA140229442182wbnmpa10519531:24000
Atherton loam, pondedAt252301906b44xpa13119761:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ATHERTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .